ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Separate-channel analysis of two-channel microarrays: recovering inter-spot information.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aging concomitantly reduces skeletal muscle proteome plasticity and hypertrophic responses to resistance training in male adults.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Protein Restriction Effects on Healthspan and Lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster Are Additive With a Longevity-Promoting Diet.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023Article
- Overnight Corticosterone and Gene Expression in Mouse Hippocampus: Time Course during Resting Period.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Advances and Trends in Omics Technology Development.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Autophagy accounts for approximately one-third of mitochondrial protein turnover and is protein selective.Autophagy · 2019Article
- Characterizing the Therapeutic Potential of a Potent BET Degrader in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Power in pairs: assessing the statistical value of paired samples in tests for differential expression.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Article
- Gene Expression Detection Assay for Cancer Clinical Use.Journal of Cancer · 2018Review
- Hypomethylating agents synergize with irinotecan to improve response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer cells.PloS one · 2017Article
- Natural variation in brain gene expression profiles of aggressive and nonaggressive individual sticklebacks.Behaviour · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- The Effect of Acute and Chronic Social Stress on the Hippocampal Transcriptome in Mice.PloS one · 2015Article
- Inhalation of rod-like carbon nanotubes causes unconventional allergic airway inflammation.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2014Article
- Differential induction of apoptosis, interferon signaling, and phagocytosis in macrophages infected with a panel of attenuated and nonattenuated poxviruses.Journal of virology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTwo-channel (or two-color) microarrays are cost-effective platforms for comparative analysis of gene expression. They are traditionally analysed in terms of the log-ratios (M-values) of the two channel intensities at each spot, but this analysis does not use all the information available in the separate channel observations. Mixed models have been proposed to analyse intensities from the two channels as separate observations, but such models can be complex to use and the gain in efficiency over the log-ratio analysis is difficult to quantify. Mixed models yield test statistics for the null distributions can be specified only approximately, and some approaches do not borrow strength between genes.
resultsThis article reformulates the mixed model to clarify the relationship with the traditional log-ratio analysis, to facilitate information borrowing between genes, and to obtain an exact distributional theory for the resulting test statistics. The mixed model is transformed to operate on the M-values and A-values (average log-expression for each spot) instead of on the log-expression values. The log-ratio analysis is shown to ignore information contained in the A-values. The relative efficiency of the log-ratio analysis is shown to depend on the size of the intraspot correlation. A new separate channel analysis method is proposed that assumes a constant intra-spot correlation coefficient across all genes. This approach permits the mixed model to be transformed into an ordinary linear model, allowing the data analysis to use a well-understood empirical Bayes analysis pipeline for linear modeling of microarray data. This yields statistically powerful test statistics that have an exact distributional theory. The log-ratio, mixed model and common correlation methods are compared using three case studies. The results show that separate channel analyses that borrow strength between genes are more powerful than log-ratio analyses. The common correlation analysis is the most powerful of all.
conclusionsThe common correlation method proposed in this article for separate-channel analysis of two-channel microarray data is no more difficult to apply in practice than the traditional log-ratio analysis. It provides an intuitive and powerful means to conduct analyses and make comparisons that might otherwise not be possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.