Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23705868›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2013

Modular, rule-based modeling for the design of eukaryotic synthetic gene circuits.

Mario Andrea Marchisio, Moreno Colaiacovo, Ellis Whitehead, Jörg Stelling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Design of Gene Boolean Gates and Circuits with Convergent Promoters.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Synthetic polycistronic sequences in eukaryotes.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multi-state modeling of biomolecules.PLoS computational biology · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Parts & pools: a framework for modular design of synthetic gene circuits.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2014
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mario Andrea MarchisioETH Zurich and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, D-BSSE, Mattenstrasse 26, Basel 4058, Switzerland. mario.marchisio@bsse.ethz.ch
Moreno Colaiacovo
Ellis Whitehead
Jörg Stelling

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe modular design of synthetic gene circuits via composable parts (DNA segments) and pools of signal carriers (molecules such as RNA polymerases and ribosomes) has been successfully applied to bacterial systems. However, eukaryotic cells are becoming a preferential host for new synthetic biology applications. Therefore, an accurate description of the intricate network of reactions that take place inside eukaryotic parts and pools is necessary. Rule-based modeling approaches are increasingly used to obtain compact representations of reaction networks in biological systems. However, this approach is intrinsically non-modular and not suitable per se for the description of composable genetic modules. In contrast, the Model Description Language (MDL) adopted by the modeling tool ProMoT is highly modular and it enables a faithful representation of biological parts and pools.

resultsWe developed a computational framework for the design of complex (eukaryotic) gene circuits by generating dynamic models of parts and pools via the joint usage of the BioNetGen rule-based modeling approach and MDL. The framework converts the specification of a part (or pool) structure into rules that serve as inputs for BioNetGen to calculate the part's species and reactions. The BioNetGen output is translated into an MDL file that gives a complete description of all the reactions that take place inside the part (or pool) together with a proper interface to connect it to other modules in the circuit. In proof-of-principle applications to eukaryotic Boolean circuits with more than ten genes and more than one thousand reactions, our framework yielded proper representations of the circuits' truth tables.

conclusionsFor the model-based design of increasingly complex gene circuits, it is critical to achieve exact and systematic representations of the biological processes with minimal effort. Our computational framework provides such a detailed and intuitive way to design new and complex synthetic gene circuits.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, GeneticAnimalsEukaryotaGenetic EngineeringOpen Reading FramesRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingTranscription Termination, GeneticRNA, MessengerRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID23705868
PMCPMC3680069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.