Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23704949›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Extension of Drosophila lifespan by Rhodiola rosea through a mechanism independent from dietary restriction.

Samuel E Schriner, Kevin Lee, Stephanie Truong, Kathyrn T Salvadora, Steven Maler, Alexander Nam, Thomas Lee, Mahtab Jafari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Phenolic Compounds ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Markers and mechanisms of death inFrontiers in aging · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Pterostilbene Promotes Mean Lifespan in Both Male and FemaleOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Improving natural product research translation: From source to clinical trial.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Extension ofAging · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The impact ofGut pathogens · 2018
    Article
  18. BioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  19. Current pharmacology reports · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel E SchrinerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Kevin Lee
Stephanie Truong
Kathyrn T Salvadora
Steven Maler
Alexander Nam
Thomas Lee
Mahtab Jafari
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Botanicals, Mitochondrial Bioenergetics, and Aging PathwaysR21AT004987 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JAFARI, MAHTAB · 2010 to 2011
$391k
NCCIH NIH HHS AT004987NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT004987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhodiola rosea has been extensively used to improve physical and mental performance and to protect against stress. We, and others, have reported that R. rosea can extend lifespan in flies, worms, and yeast. However, its molecular mechanism is currently unknown. Here, we tested whether R. rosea might act through a pathway related to dietary restriction (DR) that can extend lifespan in a range of model organisms. While the mechanism of DR itself is also unknown, three molecular pathways have been associated with it: the silent information regulator 2 (SIR2) proteins, insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling (IIS), and the target of rapamycin (TOR). In flies, DR is implemented through a reduction in dietary yeast content. We found that R. rosea extract extended lifespan in both sexes independent of the yeast content in the diet. We also found that the extract extended lifespan when the SIR2, IIS, or TOR pathways were genetically perturbed. Upon examination of water and fat content, we found that R. rosea decreased water content and elevated fat content in both sexes, but did not sensitize flies to desiccation or protect them against starvation. There were some sex-specific differences in response to R. rosea. In female flies, the expression levels of glycolytic genes and dSir2 were down-regulated, and NADH levels were decreased. In males however, R. rosea provided no protection against heat stress and had no effect on the major heat shock protein HSP70 and actually down-regulated the mitochondrial HSP22. Our findings largely rule out an elevated general resistance to stress and DR-related pathways as mechanistic candidates. The latter conclusion is especially relevant given the limited potential for DR to improve human health and lifespan, and presents R. rosea as a potential viable candidate to treat aging and age-related diseases in humans.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDesiccationDown-RegulationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGlycolysisHot TemperatureInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILipid MetabolismLongevityMaleNADDrosophila ProteinsInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor INADPeptidesPlant ExtractsWater

Identifiers

PMID23704949
PMCPMC3660385
OpenAlexW2122173619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.