Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23703923›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2013

Modeling considerations for using expression data from multiple species.

Elizabeth Siewert, Katerina J Kechris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth SiewertDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA. Stats.Speaking@gmail.com
Katerina J Kechris

Funding

Genomic regulatory sequence analysis for alcohol-related phenotypesK01AA016922 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KECHRIS-MAYS, KATHERINA · 2007 to 2011
$737k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA016922NIAAA NIH HHS K01-AA016922NLM NIH HHS T15-LM00945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although genome-wide expression data sets from multiple species are now more commonly generated, there have been few studies on how to best integrate this type of correlated data into models. Starting with a single-species, linear regression model that predicts transcription factor binding sites as a case study, we investigated how best to take into account the correlated expression data when extending this model to multiple species. Using a multivariate regression model, we accounted for the phylogenetic relationships among the species in two ways: (i) a repeated-measures model, where the error term is constrained; and (ii) a Bayesian hierarchical model, where the prior distributions of the regression coefficients are constrained. We show that both multiple-species models improve predictive performance over the single-species model. When compared with each other, the repeated-measures model outperformed the Bayesian model. We suggest a possible explanation for the better performance of the model with the constrained error term.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremData Interpretation, StatisticalLinear ModelsMultivariate AnalysisPhylogenyAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansSaccharomycesHeat-Shock Proteinsevolutionexpressionmulti-speciesmultivariate modelingtranscription

Identifiers

PMID23703923
PMCPMC4964853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.