Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23702618›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2013

Absorption and tolerability of aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate used for skin antisepsis prior to catheter insertion in preterm neonates.

A K Chapman, S W Aucott, M M Gilmore, S Advani, W Clarke, A M Milstone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aqueous chlorhexidine 1% versus 2% for neonatal skin antisepsis: a randomised non-inferiority trial.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Seeing beyond the obvious: pragmatic skin care guidance for infants 22-24 weeks gestational age.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbiome dysbiosis: a modifiable state and target to prevent Staphylococcus aureus infections and other diseases in neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The downside of antimicrobial agents for wound healing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Skin care practices in newborn nurseries and mother-baby units in Maryland.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A K ChapmanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
S W Aucott
M M Gilmore
S Advani
W Clarke
A M Milstone
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1)UL1RR025005 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$75.8M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR 025005NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess chlorhexidine absorption and skin tolerability in premature infants, following skin antisepsis with 2% aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) prior to peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement. STUDY

designNeonates less than 32 weeks gestation had skin cleansed with CHG prior to PICC placement. CHG concentrations were measured on serial blood samples. Skin integrity was evaluated for 2 weeks after CHG exposure.

resultTwenty infants were enrolled; median gestational age was 28 2/7 weeks (range 24 3/7 to 31 4/7). Ten infants had detectable serum chlorhexidine concentrations (range 1.6 to 206 ng ml(-1)). Seven of these infants had their highest serum concentration 2 to 3 days following exposure. No CHG-related skin irritation occurred in any infant.

conclusionCHG was detected in the blood of preterm infants receiving CHG skin antisepsis for PICC insertion. Highest serum concentrations occurred 2 to 3 days after exposure. Further investigation is needed to determine the clinical relevance of CHG absorption in preterm infants.

Indexed as

AntisepsisCatheterization, PeripheralInfant, PrematureAbsorptionAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornMalePilot ProjectsSkin AbsorptionTandem Mass SpectrometryAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidinechlorhexidine gluconate

Identifiers

PMID23702618
PMCPMC3766437
OpenAlexW2041093235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.