Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23702436›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2013

A qualitative study of uptake of free vitamins in England.

Tricia Jessiman, Ailsa Cameron, Meg Wiggins, Patricia J Lucas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Vitamin D, and Maternal and Child Health.Calcified tissue international · 2020
    Review
  10. Getting underneath the skin: A community engagement event for optimal vitamin D status in an 'easily overlooked' group.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Tricia JessimanSchool for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, U K. Tricia.Jessiman@bristol.ac.uk
Ailsa Cameron
Meg Wiggins
Patricia J Lucas
University of Bristol · GBUniversidad de Londres · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify reasons why eligible families are not accessing free 'Healthy Start' vitamin supplementation (providing vitamins A, C and D) in England.

designQualitative study using in-depth interviews.

setting13 primary care trusts in England.

participantsPurposive sample of 15 Healthy Start coordinators, 50 frontline health and children's professionals and 107 parents.

resultsVitamin take-up was low across all research sites, reported as below 10% of eligible beneficiaries for free vitamins. Reasons identified by both parents and professionals included (1) poor accessibility of vitamins, (2) low promotion of the scheme by health professionals, (3) a lack of awareness among eligible families, and (4) low motivation among mothers to take vitamins for themselves during pregnancy or for children under 4 years old.

conclusionsLow uptake rates can be explained by poor accessibility of vitamins and lack of awareness and motivation to take vitamin supplements among eligible families. Universal provision (at least for pregnant women) and better training for health professionals are identified as potential solutions worthy of further research and evaluation.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultChildDietary SupplementsEnglandFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansParentsPregnancyQualitative ResearchVitaminsVitaminsEpidemiologyGeneral PaediatricsHealth services researchNursingQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID23702436
PMCPMC3717763
OpenAlexW2006103962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.