Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23702113›Full record

ReviewClinics in laboratory medicine2013

New concepts in diabetic embryopathy.

Zhiyong Zhao, E Albert Reece

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in laboratory medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cardiac changes in infants of diabetic mothers.World journal of diabetes · 2021
    Review
  14. Developmental effects ofTrends in developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Leveraging Technology to Improve Diabetes Care in Pregnancy.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhiyong ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. zzhao@fpi.umaryland.edu
E Albert Reece

Funding

JHU-UMD Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079637 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI AHIMA, REXFORD S. · 2013 to 2017
$9.7M
Mechanisms of Diabetic Embryopathy and Molecular PathwaysR01DK083770 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI REECE, E. ALBERT · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079637NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is responsible for nearly 10% of fetal anomalies in diabetic pregnancies. Although aggressive perinatal care and glycemic control are available in developed countries, the birth defect rate in diabetic pregnancies remains higher than that in the general population. Major cellular activities (ie, proliferation and apoptosis) and intracellular metabolic conditions (ie, nitrosative, oxidative, and endoplasmic reticulum stress) have been shown to be associated with diabetic embryopathy using animal models. Translating advances made in animal studies into clinical applications in humans requires collaborative efforts across the basic research, preclinical, and clinical communities.

Indexed as

Fetal DiseasesHyperglycemiaPregnancy in DiabeticsAnimalsApoptosisDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalEmbryo, MammalianFemaleHumansMicePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID23702113
PMCPMC3685419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.