Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23701746›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2013

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and immunogenicity study of 4 formulations of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed plus CPG 7909 (AV7909) in healthy adult volunteers.

Robert J Hopkins, Nancy F Daczkowski, Paulina E Kaptur, Derek Muse, Eric Sheldon, Craig LaForce, Suha Sari, Thomas L Rudge, Edward Bernton

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01263691 (A Parallel-arm, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of AV7909 in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01263691 phase1completednot on this map

A Parallel-arm, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of AV7909 in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmergent BioSolutionsRan2010 to 2012Enrolled105ConditionsBacillus Anthracis (Anthrax) InfectionArmsBioThrax, AV7909 Formulation 1, AV7909 Formulation 2, AV7909 Formulation 3, AV7909 Formulation 4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Use of Anthrax Vaccine in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2019.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2019
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Intranasal vaccination with influenza HA/GO-PEI nanoparticles provides immune protection against homo- and heterologous strains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. TheMicroorganisms · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J HopkinsEmergent BioSolutions Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA. hopkinsr@ebsi.com
Nancy F Daczkowski
Paulina E Kaptur
Derek Muse
Eric Sheldon
Craig LaForce
Suha Sari
Thomas L Rudge
Edward Bernton
Emergent BioSolutions (United States) · USBattelle · USClinical Research Associates · USJean Brown Research · USNorth Carolina Clinical Research · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200800051C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new anthrax vaccine that could accelerate the immune response and possibly reduce the number of injections needed for protection would be desirable in a post-exposure setting. This Phase 1 study compared the safety and immunogenicity of 2 IM doses (Days 0 and 14) of 4 formulations of AV7909 (AVA plus CPG 7909) with 2 IM doses of BioThrax(®) (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed) and 2 IM doses of saline placebo administered on Days 0 and 14. A total of 105 healthy adults 18-50 years of age were randomized to 1 of 6 study groups: BioThrax (0.5 mL), AV7909 Formulation 1 (0.5 mL AVA+0.5mg CPG 7909), AV7909 Formulation 2 (0.5 mL AVA+0.25mg CPG 7909), AV7909 Formulation 3 (0.25 mL AVA+0.5mg CPG 7909), AV7909 Formulation 4 (0.25 mL AVA+0.25mg CPG 7909), or saline placebo (0.5 mL). All randomized subjects received at least 1 vaccination, and 100 subjects completed the trial. After 2 doses, mean peak normalized toxin neutralizing antibody responses (TNA NF50) in the AV7909 groups were higher than in the BioThrax group. Differences among the 4 AV7909 groups were not statistically significant. Subjects who received AV7909 reached peak titers on Day 28 vs. Day 35 in the BioThrax group. The most common adverse events (AEs) in the BioThrax and AV7909 groups assessed as related to vaccination were injection site reactions. Transient lymphopenia was observed after the first dose in each AV7909 group. Frequencies of injection site and systemic reactions recorded by subjects in diaries for 7 days after each injection were highest with AV7909 Formulation 1. No AEs of special interest (autoimmune events) were observed in the study. Further studies of doses and dosing regimens are planned to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of AV7909.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnthraxAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, BacterialDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOligodeoxyribonucleotidesVolunteersYoung AdultAnthrax VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntigens, BacterialBiothraxOligodeoxyribonucleotidesProMune

Identifiers

PMID23701746
PMCPMC3687017
OpenAlexW2043697982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.