Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23700415›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2013

Clinical effectiveness of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: a prospective observational multicenter study of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology interest group on insect venom hypersensitivity.

Franziska Ruëff, Bernhard Przybilla, Maria Beatrice Biló, Ulrich Müller, Fabian Scheipl, Michael J Seitz, Werner Aberer, Anna Bodzenta-Lukaszyk, Floriano Bonifazi, Paolo Campi and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Anaphylaxis after stings byHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  3. Hymenoptera venom allergy in children.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Safety and efficacy of venom immunotherapy: a real life study.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Multi-organ dysfunction secondary to severe wasp envenomation.International journal of emergency medicine · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. [Sting challenge: indications and execution].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Franziska RuëffDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany. Franziska.Rueff@med.uni-muenchen.de
Bernhard Przybilla
Maria Beatrice Biló
Ulrich Müller
Fabian Scheipl
Michael J Seitz
Werner Aberer
Anna Bodzenta-Lukaszyk
Floriano Bonifazi
Paolo Campi
Ulf Darsow
Gabrielle Haeberli
Thomas Hawranek
Helmut Küchenhoff
Roland Lang
Oliviero Quercia
Norbert Reider
Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier
Maurizio Severino
Gunter Johannes Sturm
Regina Treudler
Brunello Wüthrich
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedical University of Graz · ATNuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio · ITOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITParacelsus Medical University · ATSpital Zollikerberg · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHInnsbruck Medical University · ATMedical University of Białystok · PLOspedale per gli Infermi · ITTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment failure during venom immunotherapy (VIT) may be associated with a variety of risk factors.

objectiveOur aim was to evaluate the association of baseline serum tryptase concentration (BTC) and of other parameters with the frequency of VIT failure during the maintenance phase.

methodsIn this observational prospective multicenter study, we followed 357 patients with established honey bee or vespid venom allergy after the maintenance dose of VIT had been reached. In all patients, VIT effectiveness was either verified by sting challenge (n = 154) or patient self-reporting of the outcome of a field sting (n = 203). Data were collected on BTC, age, gender, preventive use of anti-allergic drugs (oral antihistamines and/or corticosteroids) right after a field sting, venom dose, antihypertensive medication, type of venom, side effects during VIT, severity of index sting reaction preceding VIT, and duration of VIT. Relative rates were calculated with generalized additive models.

results22 patients (6.2%) developed generalized symptoms during sting challenge or after a field sting. A strong association between the frequency of VIT failure and BTC could be excluded. Due to wide confidence bands, however, weaker effects (odds ratios <3) of BTC were still possible, and were also suggested by a selective analysis of patients who had a sting challenge. The most important factor associated with VIT failure was a honey bee venom allergy. Preventive use of anti-allergic drugs may be associated with a higher protection rate.

interpretationIt is unlikely that an elevated BTC has a strong negative effect on the rate of treatment failures. The magnitude of the latter, however, may depend on the method of effectiveness assessment. Failure rate is higher in patients suffering from bee venom allergy.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicAdultAnaphylaxisAnimalsBeesBee VenomsFemaleHumansInsect Bites and StingsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveTreatment FailureWaspsBee VenomsWasp Venoms

Identifiers

PMID23700415
PMCPMC3659083
OpenAlexW1964351780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.