Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23700403›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Stimulating myocardial regeneration with periostin Peptide in large mammals improves function post-myocardial infarction but increases myocardial fibrosis.

Dennis Ladage, Elisa Yaniz-Galende, Kleopatra Rapti, Kiyotake Ishikawa, Lisa Tilemann, Scott Shapiro, Yoshiaki Takewa, Jochen Muller-Ehmsen, Martin Schwarz, Mario J Garcia and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Evolving our understanding of vitamin D, periostin levels and cardiovascular risk in the elderly: a cross sectional study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The role of periostin in cardiac fibrosis.Heart failure reviews · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Role of Matrix Proteins in Cardiac Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cardiac fibroblast activation during myocardial infarction wound healing: Fibroblast polarization after MI.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Model organisms at the heart of regeneration.Disease models & mechanisms · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dennis LadageCardiovascular Research Center, Department of Cardiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. dennis.ladage@mssm.edu
Elisa Yaniz-Galende
Kleopatra Rapti
Kiyotake Ishikawa
Lisa Tilemann
Scott Shapiro
Yoshiaki Takewa
Jochen Muller-Ehmsen
Martin Schwarz
Mario J Garcia
Javier Sanz
Roger J Hajjar
Yoshiaki Kawase

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsMammalian myocardium has a finite but limited capacity to regenerate. Experimentally stimulating proliferation of cardiomyocytes with extracellular regeneration factors like periostin enhances cardiac repair in rodents. The aim of this study was to develop a safe method for delivering regeneration factors to the heart and to test the functional and structural effects of periostin peptide treatment in a large animal model of myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND

resultsWe developed a controlled release system to deliver recombinant periostin peptide into the pericardial space. A single application of this method was performed two days after experimental MI in swine. Animals were randomly assigned to receive either saline or periostin peptide. Experimental groups were compared at baseline, day 2, 1 month and 3 months. Treatment with periostin peptide increased the EF from 31% to 41% and decreased by 22% the infarct size within 12 weeks. Periostin peptide-treated animals had newly formed myocardium strips within the infarct scar, leading to locally improved myocardial function. In addition the capillary density was increased in animals receiving periostin. However, periostin peptide treatment increased myocardial fibrosis in the remote region at one week and 12 weeks post-treatment.

conclusionOur study shows that myocardial regeneration through targeted peptides is possible. However, in the case of periostin the effects on cardiac fibrosis may limit its clinical application as a viable therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

RegenerationAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsCell Adhesion MoleculesCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCoronary VesselsDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleFibrosisGelatin Sponge, AbsorbableHeartMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacMyofibroblastsAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsCell Adhesion MoleculesPOSTN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23700403
PMCPMC3659021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.