Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23700221›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2013

Ligand binding site similarity identification based on chemical and geometric similarity.

Haibo Tu, Tieliu Shi

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Exhaustive comparison and classification of ligand-binding surfaces in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haibo TuCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Regulatory Biology, The Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Life Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200241, China.
Tieliu Shi
East China Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The similarity comparison of binding sites based on amino acid between different proteins can facilitate protein function identification. However, Binding site usually consists of several crucial amino acids which are frequently dispersed among different regions of a protein and consequently make the comparison of binding sites difficult. In this study, we introduce a new method, named as chemical and geometric similarity of binding site (CGS-BSite), to compute the ligand binding site similarity based on discrete amino acids with maximum-weight bipartite matching algorithm. The principle of computing the similarity is to find a Euclidean Transformation which makes the similar amino acids approximate to each other in a geometry space, and vice versa. CGS-BSite permits site and ligand flexibilities, provides a stable prediction performance on the flexible ligand binding sites. Binding site prediction on three test datasets with CGS-BSite method has similar performance to Patch-Surfer method but outperforms other five tested methods, reaching to 0.80, 0.71 and 0.85 based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, respectively. It performs a marginally better than Patch-Surfer on the binding sites with small volume and higher hydrophobicity, and presents good robustness to the variance of the volume and hydrophobicity of ligand binding sites. Overall, our method provides an alternative approach to compute the ligand binding site similarity and predict potential special ligand binding sites from the existing ligand targets based on the target similarity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinLigandsProtein BindingProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23700221
OpenAlexW2062993721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.