Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23700028›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2013

Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design.

Alan R Tait, Terri Voepel-Lewis, Vijayan N Nair, Naveen N Narisetty, Angela Fagerlin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Permission form synopses to improve parents' understanding of research: a randomized trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Can we make informed consent forms more informative?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2018
    Article
  8. Development of Plain Language Supplemental Materials for the Biobank Informed Consent Process.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alan R TaitDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. atait@umich.edu
Terri Voepel-Lewis
Vijayan N Nair
Naveen N Narisetty
Angela Fagerlin

Funding

Strategies to Optimize Communication of Informed Consent for Pediatric ResearchR01HD053594 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TAIT, ALAN R · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceResearch information should be presented in a manner that promotes understanding. However, many parents and research subjects have difficulty understanding and making informed decisions.

objectiveTo examine the effect of different communication strategies on parental understanding of research information.

designObservational study from January 2010 to June 2012 using a fractional factorial design.

settingLarge tertiary care children's hospital.

participantsSix hundred forty parents of children scheduled for elective surgery.

interventionsParents were randomized to receive information about a hypothetical pain trial presented in 1 of 16 consent documents containing different combinations of 5 selected communication strategies (ie, length, readability, processability [formatting], graphical display, and supplemental verbal disclosure). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Parents were interviewed to determine their understanding of the study elements (eg, protocol and alternatives) and their gist (main point) and verbatim (actual) understanding of the risks and benefits.

resultsMain effects for understanding were found for processability, readability, message length, use of graphics, and verbal discussion. Consent documents with high processability, eighth-grade reading level, and graphics resulted in significantly greater gist and verbatim understanding compared with forms without these attributes (mean difference, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.26-0.88, number of correct responses of 7 and mean difference, 0.54; 95% CI,0.20-0.88, number of correct responses of 4 for gist and verbatim, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results identified several communication strategy combinations that improved parents' understanding of research information. Adoption of these active strategies by investigators, clinicians, institutional review boards, and study sponsors represents a simple, practical, and inexpensive means to optimize the consent message and enhance parental, participant, and patient understanding.

Indexed as

CommunicationComprehensionAdultBiomedical ResearchConsent FormsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleParentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23700028
PMCPMC3700595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.