Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23698524›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Comparison of five media for detection of extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase by use of the wasp instrument for automated specimen processing.

P Grohs, B Tillecovidin, A Caumont-Prim, E Carbonnelle, N Day, I Podglajen, L Gutmann

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Detection of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. High Prevalence ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Performance of Copan WASP for Routine Urine Microbiology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P GrohsService de Microbiologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France. patrick.grohs@egp.aphp.fr
B Tillecovidin
A Caumont-Prim
E Carbonnelle
N Day
I Podglajen
L Gutmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overall, 2,337 rectal screening samples (RSSs) were seeded by using the Wasp instrument for automated microbiological processing with five media for detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL): CHROMagar, ChromID, Brilliance, BD Drigalski, and HEGP media. Of 354 RSSs harboring ESBL-producing isolates, 89.3% were found to be positive on all media. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 95.5 to 98.3% and from 57.9 to 72.3%, respectively. No medium was perfectly ESBL selective, and non-ESBL-producing strains were mainly Enterobacteriaceae overproducing AmpC β-lactamase and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, mostly Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryBacteriological Techniquesbeta-LactamasesCulture MediaFecesGram-Negative BacteriaHumansSensitivity and Specificitybeta-LactamasesCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID23698524
PMCPMC3719624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.