Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23697986›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2013

Holding on to the indispensable medication--a grounded theory on medication use from the perspective of persons with medication overuse headache.

Pernilla Jonsson, Annika Jakobsson, Gunnel Hensing, Mattias Linde, Crystal Dea Moore, Tove Hedenrud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. GPs' experiences with brief intervention for medication-overuse headache: a qualitative study in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Critical Evaluation on MOH Current Treatments.Current treatment options in neurology · 2017
    Review
  14. Medication-overuse headache: a perspective review.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Medication overuse headache in children and adolescents.Current pain and headache reports · 2014
    Review
  17. Medication-overuse headache: a review.Journal of pain research · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Pernilla JonssonInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 453SE 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden. pernilla.jonsson@socmed.gu.se
Annika Jakobsson
Gunnel Hensing
Mattias Linde
Crystal Dea Moore
Tove Hedenrud
University of Gothenburg · SESkidmore College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication overuse headache (MOH) is a chronic headache disorder, caused by overuse of acute medication. To date, it remains unclear why some people overuse these medications. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how individuals with MOH use medications and other strategies to manage headaches in their daily lives, and their thoughts about their own use of acute medication. Our intention was to develop a theoretical model about the development of MOH, from the perspective of those with MOH.

methodsData collection and analysis were conducted according to grounded theory methodology. The participants were recruited via newspaper advertisements. Fourteen persons with MOH were interviewed in individual qualitative interviews.

resultsThe basic process leading to medication overuse was holding on to the indispensable medication. The acute medication was indispensable to the participants because they perceived it as the only thing that could prevent headaches from ruining their lives. The participants perceived headaches as something that threatened to ruin their lives. As a result, they went to great lengths trying to find ways to manage it. They tried numerous strategies. However, the only strategy actually perceived as effective was the use of acute medication and they eventually became resigned to the idea that it was the only effective aid. The acute medication thus became indispensable. Their general intention was to use as little medication as possible but they found themselves compelled to medicate frequently to cope with their headaches. They did not like to think about their medication use and sometimes avoided keeping track of the amount used.

conclusionsThis qualitative study adds understanding to the process via which MOH develops from the perspective of those having MOH. Such knowledge may help bridge the gap between the perspectives of patients and health-care professionals.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesicsFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID23697986
PMCPMC3671143
OpenAlexW2161164814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.