Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23697682›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2013

Does vasopressor therapy have an indication in hemorrhagic shock?

François Beloncle, Ferhat Meziani, Nicolas Lerolle, Peter Radermacher, Pierre Asfar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04497155 (The Association of Norepinephrine Use in Pre-hospital Transport and Early Mortality in Hemorrhagic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04497155 completednot on this map

The Association of Norepinephrine Use in Pre-hospital Transport and Early Mortality in Hemorrhagic Shock

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2013 to 2021Enrolled2,164ConditionsTraumatic Shock, Hemorrhagic Shock, Traumatic Brain Injury, Hypotension and ShockArmsNorepinephrine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cerebral effects of resuscitation with either epinephrine or vasopressin in an animal model of hemorrhagic shock.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

François BeloncleLaboratoire HIFIH, UPRES EA 3859, IFR 132, Université d'Angers, PRES LUNAM, Angers, France. piasfar@chu-angers.fr.
Ferhat Meziani
Nicolas Lerolle
Peter Radermacher
Pierre Asfar
Université d'Angers · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRUniversité Nantes Angers Le Mans · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aimed to answer whether the vasopressors are useful at the early phase of hemorrhagic shock. Data were taken from published experimental studies and clinical trials. Published case reports were discarded. A search of electronic database PubMed was conducted using keywords of hemorrhagic shock, vasopressors, vasoconstrictors, norepinephrine, epinephrine, vasopressin. The redundant papers were not included. We identified 15 experimental studies that compared hemorrhagic shock resuscitated with or without vasopressors, three retrospective clinical studies, and one controlled trial. The experimental and clinical studies are discussed in the clinical context, and their strengths as well as limitations are highlighted. There is a strong rationale for a vasopressor support in severe hemorrhagic shock. However, this should be tempered by the risk of excessive vasoconstriction during such hypovolemic state. The experimental models must be analyzed within their own limits and cannot be directly translated into clinical practice. In addition, because of many biases, the results of clinical trials are debatable. Therefore, based on current information, further clinical trials comparing early vasopressor support plus fluid resuscitation versus fluid resuscitation alone are warranted.

Identifiers

PMID23697682
PMCPMC3691630
OpenAlexW2172005042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.