Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23696851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Burying dogs in ancient Cis-Baikal, Siberia: temporal trends and relationships with human diet and subsistence practices.

Robert J Losey, Sandra Garvie-Lok, Jennifer A Leonard, M Anne Katzenberg, Mietje Germonpré, Tatiana Nomokonova, Mikhail V Sablin, Olga I Goriunova, Natalia E Berdnikova, Nikolai A Savel'ev

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Origins and genetic legacy of prehistoric dogs.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert J LoseyDepartment of Anthropology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. robert.losey@ualberta.ca
Sandra Garvie-Lok
Jennifer A Leonard
M Anne Katzenberg
Mietje Germonpré
Tatiana Nomokonova
Mikhail V Sablin
Olga I Goriunova
Natalia E Berdnikova
Nikolai A Savel'ev
Irkutsk State University · RUUniversity of Alberta · CAConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstitute of Natural Sciences · BEUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAZoological Institute · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first objective of this study is to examine temporal patterns in ancient dog burials in the Lake Baikal region of Eastern Siberia. The second objective is to determine if the practice of dog burial here can be correlated with patterns in human subsistence practices, in particular a reliance on terrestrial mammals. Direct radiocarbon dating of a suite of the region's dog remains indicates that these animals were given burial only during periods in which human burials were common. Dog burials of any kind were most common during the Early Neolithic (∼7-8000 B.P.), and rare during all other time periods. Further, only foraging groups seem to have buried canids in this region, as pastoralist habitation sites and cemeteries generally lack dog interments, with the exception of sacrificed animals. Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope data indicate that dogs were only buried where and when human diets were relatively rich in aquatic foods, which here most likely included river and lake fish and Baikal seal (Phoca sibirica). Generally, human and dog diets appear to have been similar across the study subregions, and this is important for interpreting their radiocarbon dates, and comparing them to those obtained on the region's human remains, both of which likely carry a freshwater old carbon bias. Slight offsets were observed in the isotope values of dogs and humans in our samples, particularly where both have diets rich in aquatic fauna. This may result from dietary differences between people and their dogs, perhaps due to consuming fish of different sizes, or even different tissues from the same aquatic fauna. This paper also provides a first glimpse of the DNA of ancient canids in Northeast Asia.

Indexed as

BurialCultureDietAnimalsArchaeologyBone and BonesDogsGeographyHaplotypesHistory, AncientHumansMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRadiometric DatingSequence Analysis, DNASiberia

Identifiers

PMID23696851
PMCPMC3656967
OpenAlexW2054575243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.