ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Interface-resolved network of protein-protein interactions.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating protein copy numbers with interaction networks to quantify stoichiometry in clathrin-mediated endocytosis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Improved sequence-based prediction of interaction sites in α-helical transmembrane proteins by deep learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Stoichiometric balance of protein copy numbers is measurable and functionally significant in a protein-protein interaction network for yeast endocytosis.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Cytosolic proteins can exploit membrane localization to trigger functional assembly.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Article
- Protein-protein binding selectivity and network topology constrain global and local properties of interface binding networks.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
- GreedyPlus: An Algorithm for the Alignment of Interface Interaction Networks.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Competition-cooperation relationship networks characterize the competition and cooperation between proteins.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Structure-based inhibition of protein-protein interactions.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2015Review
- Article
- Calcineurin regulates the yeast synaptojanin Inp53/Sjl3 during membrane stress.Molecular biology of the cell · 2015Article
- MSEA: detection and quantification of mutation hotspots through mutation set enrichment analysis.Genome biology · 2014Article
- Evolutionary pressure on the topology of protein interface interaction networks.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2013Article
- Rule-based modeling: a computational approach for studying biomolecular site dynamics in cell signaling systems.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We define an interface-interaction network (IIN) to capture the specificity and competition between protein-protein interactions (PPI). This new type of network represents interactions between individual interfaces used in functional protein binding and thereby contains the detail necessary to describe the competition and cooperation between any pair of binding partners. Here we establish a general framework for the construction of IINs that merges computational structure-based interface assignment with careful curation of available literature. To complement limited structural data, the inclusion of biochemical data is critical for achieving the accuracy and completeness necessary to analyze the specificity and competition between the protein interactions. Firstly, this procedure provides a means to clarify the information content of existing data on purported protein interactions and to remove indirect and spurious interactions. Secondly, the IIN we have constructed here for proteins involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) exhibits distinctive topological properties. In contrast to PPI networks with their global and relatively dense connectivity, the fragmentation of the IIN into distinctive network modules suggests that different functional pressures act on the evolution of its topology. Large modules in the IIN are formed by interfaces sharing specificity for certain domain types, such as SH3 domains distributed across different proteins. The shared and distinct specificity of an interface is necessary for effective negative and positive design of highly selective binding targets. Lastly, the organization of detailed structural data in a network format allows one to identify pathways of specific binding interactions and thereby predict effects of mutations at specific surfaces on a protein and of specific binding inhibitors, as we explore in several examples. Overall, the endocytosis IIN is remarkably complex and rich in features masked in the coarser PPI, and collects relevant detail of protein association in a readily interpretable format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.