Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23696621›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2013

Antibiotic resistance in Prevotella species isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis.

Laura J Sherrard, Kathryn A Graham, Stef J McGrath, Leanne McIlreavey, Joseph Hatch, Marianne S Muhlebach, Matthew C Wolfgang, Deirdre F Gilpin, J Stuart Elborn, Thamarai Schneiders and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2021
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Journal of dental sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura J SherrardCF & Airways Microbiology Group, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Kathryn A Graham
Stef J McGrath
Leanne McIlreavey
Joseph Hatch
Marianne S Muhlebach
Matthew C Wolfgang
Deirdre F Gilpin
J Stuart Elborn
Thamarai Schneiders
Michael M Tunney
Queen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

The Mucus Transport Apparatus: Why Two Layers?P50HL084934 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOUCHER, RICHARD CHARLES · 2006 to 2010
$15.6M
The Role of Anaerobic Bacterial Infection in Cystic FibrosisR01HL092964 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOUCHER, RICHARD CHARLES · 2010 to 2013
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5R01 HL092964-04NHLBI NIH HHS HL084934NHLBI NIH HHS HL092964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the antimicrobial susceptibility of Prevotella spp. isolated from cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF patients and analyse the impact of antibiotic prescribing in the preceding year on resistance amongst CF isolates.

methodsThe susceptibility of 80 CF Prevotella isolates to 12 antibiotics was compared with that of 50 Prevotella isolates from invasive infections in people who did not have CF and 27 Prevotella isolates from healthy controls.

resultsAll isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam, with only four isolates resistant to metronidazole. However, resistance to amoxicillin, ceftazidime and tetracycline was apparent in all groups. Significant differences in clindamycin resistance (UK CF, 56%; UK invasive, 10%) and co-amoxiclav non-susceptibility (UK CF, 32%; UK invasive, 12%) were observed between UK CF and UK invasive isolates. The likelihood of non-susceptibility to clindamycin and co-amoxiclav in UK CF isolates was 5.5-fold and 2.5-fold higher relative to that in UK invasive isolates, respectively. Azithromycin MICs were also significantly higher for CF isolates (P < 0.001), which was associated with current prescription of azithromycin. More than 50% of clinical isolates tested in this study were β-lactamase positive.

conclusionsThis study profiles antibiotic susceptibility in Prevotella spp. in CF and demonstrates that meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, chloramphenicol and metronidazole are likely to be the most effective antibiotics if treatment is indicated.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteroidaceae Infectionsbeta-LactamasesChildChild, PreschoolCystic FibrosisFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPrevotellaAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamasesanaerobic bacteriaantimicrobial susceptibilityβ-lactamase production

Identifiers

PMID23696621
PMCPMC3772740
OpenAlexW2120721207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.