Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23695823›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2013

Prospective validation that vulnerable plaque associated with major adverse outcomes have larger plaque volume, less dense calcium, and more non-calcified plaque by quantitative, three-dimensional measurements using intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis : results from the ATLANTA I Study.

Jesus G Vazquez-Figueroa, Sarah Rinehart, Zhen Qian, Parag H Joshi, Abhinav Sharma, James Lee, Hunt Anderson, Laura Murrieta, Charles Wilmer, Harold Carlson and 6 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jesus G Vazquez-FigueroaAtlanta Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA, ggus@hotmail.com.
Sarah Rinehart
Zhen Qian
Parag H Joshi
Abhinav Sharma
James Lee
Hunt Anderson
Laura Murrieta
Charles Wilmer
Harold Carlson
Kenneth Taylor
William Ballard
Dimitri Karmpaliotis
Anna Kalynych
Charles Brown
Szilard Voros

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether quantitative, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional plaque measurements by intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter (IVUS/VH) are different between intermediate lesions with or without major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is unknown. IVUS/VH-derived parameters were compared in 60 patients with an intermediate coronary lesion (40-70 %) between lesions that did or did not result in MACE over 12 months. IVUS/VH measurements were done at the site of the minimal lumen area (MLA) and on a per-plaque basis, defined by 40 % plaque burden. Pre-specified, adjudicated MACE events occurred in 5 of 60 patients (8.3 %). MACE lesions had larger plaque burden (65 % vs. 53 %, p = 0.004), less dense calcium (6.6 % vs. 14.7 %, p = 0.05), and more non-calcified plaque, mostly fibrofatty kind (17.6 % vs. 10 %, p = 0.02). Intermediate coronary lesions associated with MACE at 12 months have more plaque, less dense calcium, and more non-calcified plaque, particularly fibrofatty tissue by IVUS/VH.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalPlaque, AtheroscleroticAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsDisease ProgressionFemaleFibrosisGeorgiaHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23695823
PMCPMC3790919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.