ArticleInternational journal of hematology2013
Prediction model for CD34 positive cell yield in peripheral blood stem cell collection on the fourth day after G-CSF administration in healthy donors.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting apheresis yield and factors affecting peripheral blood stem cell harvesting using a machine learning model.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is an indispensable treatment option for hematological malignancy. The optimal collection day after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration should be determined by peripheral blood pre-apheresis CD34 positive (CD34⁺) cell percentage. However, pre-apheresis CD34⁺ cell analysis is not available for most institutions in Japan. Prediction of the optimal collection day based on objective parameters, other than direct CD34⁺ cell count, is thus an important matter for investigation. To identify potential predictive factors, clinical parameters in 79 related donors who received allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection were analyzed. Eight factors were significantly correlated with the number of CD34⁺ cells per donor body weight on the fourth day (day 4) after G-CSF administration in univariate analysis. Using multi-regression analysis, we made a simple scoring system comprising age, sex, LDH on day 4 and RBC count at the baseline, which significantly predicted CD34⁺ cell yield (P = 0.048). This system allows us to determine the optimal PBSC collection day. When the score is 0 or 1 on day 4, starting apheresis on day 5 potentially helps avoiding the need for multiple harvests. Score 3 or 4 on day 4 is indicative of better performance if apheresis is started on day 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.