Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23695697›Full record

ArticleNature communications2013

Thermally assisted quantum annealing of a 16-qubit problem.

N G Dickson, M W Johnson, M H Amin, R Harris, F Altomare, A J Berkley, P Bunyk, J Cai, E M Chapple, P Chavez and 29 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Physics successfully implements Lagrange multiplier optimization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Quantum-circuit refrigerator.Nature communications · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

N G DicksonD-Wave Systems Inc., 100-4401 Still Creek Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5C 6G9.
M W Johnson
M H Amin
R Harris
F Altomare
A J Berkley
P Bunyk
J Cai
E M Chapple
P Chavez
F Cioata
T Cirip
P Debuen
M Drew-Brook
C Enderud
S Gildert
F Hamze
J P Hilton
E Hoskinson
K Karimi
E Ladizinsky
N Ladizinsky
T Lanting
T Mahon
R Neufeld
T Oh
I Perminov
C Petroff
A Przybysz
C Rich
P Spear
A Tcaciuc
M C Thom
E Tolkacheva
S Uchaikin
J Wang
A B Wilson
Z Merali
G Rose

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to develop useful quantum computers have been blocked primarily by environmental noise. Quantum annealing is a scheme of quantum computation that is predicted to be more robust against noise, because despite the thermal environment mixing the system's state in the energy basis, the system partially retains coherence in the computational basis, and hence is able to establish well-defined eigenstates. Here we examine the environment's effect on quantum annealing using 16 qubits of a superconducting quantum processor. For a problem instance with an isolated small-gap anticrossing between the lowest two energy levels, we experimentally demonstrate that, even with annealing times eight orders of magnitude longer than the predicted single-qubit decoherence time, the probabilities of performing a successful computation are similar to those expected for a fully coherent system. Moreover, for the problem studied, we show that quantum annealing can take advantage of a thermal environment to achieve a speedup factor of up to 1,000 over a closed system.

Identifiers

PMID23695697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.