Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23695195›Full record

SynthesisDer Orthopade2013

[Satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Comparison of 1990-1999 with 2000-2012].

A Schulze, H P Scharf

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Orthopade, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Validation of an MRI Technique for the 6-DOF Knee Kinematics Measurement.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effect of polyethylene conformity on total knee arthroplasty early clinical outcomes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty.Knee surgery & related research · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A SchulzeOrthopädisch-Unfallchirurgisches Zentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland, astrid.schulze@umm.de.
H P Scharf
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common operations in orthopedic surgery worldwide but despite being mainly successful only 81 % of patients are satisfied with the final result. The following systematic review compared patient satisfaction and analyzed the causal connections and influencing factors after TKA between 1990-1999 and 2000-2012. From 1990 to 1999 a total of 81.2 % of patients were satisfied after TKA and in the period 2000-2012 patient satisfaction increased to 85 %. Influencing factors on postoperative satisfaction derived from the 25 publications included in the study were consistently body-mass index, patient expectations, pain, joint function and mental factors. A lack of satisfaction scores and different designs resulted in difficulties in comparing the studies and were subsequently limitations of this study.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingQuality of LifeArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeComorbidityFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMalePatient SatisfactionPostoperative PainPrevalenceRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23695195
OpenAlexW3212072798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.