Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23695154›Full record

Observational studySchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2013

[End of life care in general practice: results of an observational survey with general practitioners].

I Gágyor, A Lüthke, M Jansky, J-F Chenot

Abstract readEnglish AbstractObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

I GágyorAbteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Humboldtallee 38, 37073, Göttingen, Deutschland. igagyor@gwdg.de
A Lüthke
M Jansky
J-F Chenot

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the amount of end of life care provided by general practitioners (GPs) in Germany. Therefore the aim of the HAVEL study is to describe the involvement of GPs in end of life care in more detail.

methodsData from all patients who died from natural causes within a period of 12 months (n = 452) were collected from 30 general practices with a self-developed questionnaire and compared to data from patients who died in hospice or palliative care units.

resultsContact rates with GPs increased at the end of life and approximately half of the patients (48 %) were seen within 48 h prior to death. A different spectrum of diseases and symptoms were observed compared to hospice and palliative care units with predominantly chronic diseases (e.g. cardiovascular and mental diseases). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsGeneral practitioners are highly involved in palliative health care, even for patients who eventually die in hospitals. Differences in patient characteristics and circumstances compared to specialized palliative care should be reflected in curricula for training in palliative care and the definition of a palliative situation.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumData CollectionEducation, MedicalFaculty, MedicalGeneral PracticeGermanyHumansNational Health ProgramsPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal Care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.