Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23691495›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2013

Actinomycetes: a repertory of green catalysts with a potential revenue resource.

Divya Prakash, Neelu Nawani, Mansi Prakash, Manish Bodas, Abul Mandal, Madhukar Khetmalas, Balasaheb Kapadnis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A Review on Bacterial Contribution to Lignocellulose Breakdown into Useful Bio-Products.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  12. Secondary metabolites and biodiversity of actinomycetes.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Whole Cell Actinobacteria as Biocatalysts.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Divya PrakashDr D Y Patil Biotechnology & Bioinformatics Institute, Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
Neelu Nawani
Mansi Prakash
Manish Bodas
Abul Mandal
Madhukar Khetmalas
Balasaheb Kapadnis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biocatalysis, one of the oldest technologies, is becoming a favorable alternative to chemical processes and a vital part of green technology. It is an important revenue generating industry due to a global market projected at $7 billion in 2013 with a growth of 6.7% for enzymes alone. Some microbes are important sources of enzymes and are preferred over sources of plant and animal origin. As a result, more than 50% of the industrial enzymes are obtained from bacteria. The constant search for novel enzymes with robust characteristics has led to improvisations in the industrial processes, which is the key for profit growth. Actinomycetes constitute a significant component of the microbial population in most soils and can produce extracellular enzymes which can decompose various materials. Their enzymes are more attractive than enzymes from other sources because of their high stability and unusual substrate specificity. Actinomycetes found in extreme habitats produce novel enzymes with huge commercial potential. This review attempts to highlight the global importance of enzymes and extends to signify actinomycetes as promising harbingers of green technology.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisActinobacteriaEnzymesIndiaIndustrial MicrobiologyMarketingEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID23691495
PMCPMC3652136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.