ArticlePloS one2013
The identification of gut neuroendocrine tumor disease by multiple synchronous transcript analysis in blood.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02270567 (A Registry for Neuroendocrine Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Registry for Neuroendocrine Tumors
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 165 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Prognostic factors for the outcome of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in MEN1: a systematic review of literature.Endocrine-related cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of circulating chromogranin a for neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Circulating Gene Expression Assay as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in MEN1.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Indications for Surgical Resection in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases: An Intensive Surgical Experience of a High-Volume Center.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- The promise of integrating omics-driven liquid biopsy and machine learning algorithms with multi-tracer PET in the management of neuroendocrine tumors: envisioning a panoptic model for precision oncology and molecular theranostics.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- A promising frontier of circulating messenger RNA in liquid biopsy: From mechanisms to clinical applications.International journal of cancer · 2025Review
- The Evolving Landscape of GEP-NENs in the Era of Precision Oncology: Molecular Insights into Tumor Heterogeneity.Cancers · 2025Review
- NETest® 2.0-A decade of innovation in neuroendocrine tumor diagnostics.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- A blood-based liquid biopsy analyzing soluble immune checkpoints and cytokines identifies distinct neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Developing a peripheral blood RNA-seq based NETseq ensemble classifier: A potential novel tool for non-invasive detection and treatment response assessment in neuroendocrine tumor patients receivingJournal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- Comparative Targeted Genome Profiling between Solid and Liquid Biopsies in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study.Neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- Review
- Surgical Management and Long-Term Evaluation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2024Review
- Evaluation of a blood miRNA/mRNA signature to follow-up Lu-PRRT therapy for G1/G2 intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Prioritization of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Probes for Differentiating Primary Sites of Neuroendocrine Tumors with Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The Quest for Circulating Biomarkers in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: a Clinical Perspective.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Monitoring and Surveillance of Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Radioligand Therapy.Cancers · 2023Review
- An Overview of Circulating Biomarkers in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Clinical Guide.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors-10-Year Experience of the Ottawa Hospital (TOH).Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasing in both incidence and prevalence. A delay in correct diagnosis is common for these lesions. This reflects the absence of specific blood biomarkers to detect NENs. Measurement of the neuroendocrine secretory peptide Chromogranin A (CgA) is used, but is a single value, is non-specific and assay data are highly variable. To facilitate tumor detection, we developed a multi-transcript molecular signature for PCR-based blood analysis. NEN transcripts were identified by computational analysis of 3 microarray datasets: NEN tissue (n = 15), NEN peripheral blood (n = 7), and adenocarcinoma (n = 363 tumors). The candidate gene signature was examined in 130 blood samples (NENs: n = 63) and validated in two independent sets (Set 1 [n = 115, NENs: n = 72]; Set 2 [n = 120, NENs: n = 58]). Comparison with CgA (ELISA) was undertaken in 176 samples (NENs: n = 81). 51 significantly elevated transcript markers were identified. Gene-based classifiers detected NENs in independent sets with high sensitivity (85-98%), specificity (93-97%), PPV (95-96%) and NPV (87-98%). The AUC for the NEN gene-based classifiers was 0.95-0.98 compared to 0.64 for CgA (Z-statistic 6.97-11.42, p<0.0001). Overall, the gene-based classifier was significantly (χ(2) = 12.3, p<0.0005) more accurate than CgA. In a sub-analysis, pancreatic NENs and gastrointestinal NENs could be identified with similar efficacy (79-88% sensitivity, 94% specificity), as could metastases (85%). In patients with low CgA, 91% exhibited elevated transcript markers. A panel of 51 marker genes differentiates NENs from controls with a high PPV and NPV (>90%), identifies pancreatic and gastrointestinal NENs with similar efficacy, and confirms GEP-NENs when CgA levels are low. The panel is significantly more accurate than the CgA assay. This reflects its utility to identify multiple diverse biological components of NENs. Application of this sensitive and specific PCR-based blood test to NENs will allow accurate detection of disease, and potentially define disease progress enabling monitoring of treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.