Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23690415›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2013

Should a woman age 70 to 80 years receive radiation after breast-conserving surgery?

Jaroslaw T Hepel, David E Wazer

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaroslaw T HepelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
David E Wazer
Brown University · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Case 1: A 72-year-old woman presents with a palpable mass detected during yearly physical examination by her primary care physician. She has controlled hypertension and remains active, playing tennis three times a week. Physical examination reveals a 1.5 cm mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast with no palpable axillary lymphadenopathy. Diagnostic imaging reveals a suspicious mass, and core biopsy confirms invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) that is estrogen receptor moderately positive (60%), progesterone receptor negative and Her2-neu that is not overexpressed. She undergoes a wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy. Pathology reveals a 1.5 cm IDC that is high grade without lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The margins are negative with the closest laterally at 2 mm. One sentinel node is negative for metastasis. Case 2: A 72-year-old woman presents with an abnormal screening mammogram that shows a small area of architectural distortion in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast (Fig 1). She is a former smoker with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and has mild to moderately symptomatic osteoarthritis managed with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent. She remains active and independent. Physical examination reveals neither palpable breast mass nor axillary lymphadenopathy. Diagnostic ultrasound confirms a 1.8 cm mass, and core biopsy reveals IDC that is estrogen and progesterone receptor strongly positive (> 90%) and Her2-neu that is not overexpressed. She undergoes a wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy. Pathology reveals a 1.9 cm IDC that is low grade. The margins are widely negative at > 5 mm and there is no LVI. One sentinel node is negative for metastasis.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifenAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID23690415
OpenAlexW1980348753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.