Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23690414›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2013

Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.

Eduardo Bruera, Sriram Yennurajalingam, J Lynn Palmer, Pedro E Perez-Cruz, Susan Frisbee-Hume, Julio A Allo, Janet L Williams, Marlene Z Cohen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04525924 (Feasibility Study of Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04525924 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study of Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy (BLT) for Amelioration of Fatigue in Chinese Cancer Patients Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Authority, Hong KongRan2020 to 2020Enrolled42ConditionsFatigue, CancerArmsbright light therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of Fatigue in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO-Society for Integrative Oncology Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. The efficacy of placebo for the treatment of cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2015
    Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Randomized Controlled Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Fatigue Interference With Functioning in Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  13. Methylphenidate Versus Placebo for Treating Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Open-label placebo reduces fatigue in cancer survivors: a randomized trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Trial
  19. Docetaxel-related fatigue in men with metastatic prostate cancer: a descriptive analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Trial
  20. Effect of dance on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eduardo BrueraDepartment of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. ebruera@mdanderson.org
Sriram Yennurajalingam
J Lynn Palmer
Pedro E Perez-Cruz
Susan Frisbee-Hume
Julio A Allo
Janet L Williams
Marlene Z Cohen
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CL

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Methylphenidate for Fatigue in Advanced Cancer PatientsR01NR010162 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BRUERA, EDUARDO · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010162NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010162-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer-related-fatigue (CRF) is common in advanced cancer. The primary objective of the study was to compare the effects of methylphenidate (MP) with those of placebo (PL) on CRF as measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) fatigue subscale. The effect of a combined intervention including MP plus a nursing telephone intervention (NTI) was also assessed. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with advanced cancer with a fatigue score of ≥ 4 out of 10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were randomly assigned to one of the following four groups: MP+NTI, PL+NTI, MP + control telephone intervention (CTI), and PL+CTI. Methylphenidate dose was 5 mg every 2 hours as needed up to 20 mg per day. The primary end point was the median difference in FACIT-F fatigue at day 15. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, and sleep.

resultsOne hundred forty-one patients were evaluable. Median FACIT-F fatigue scores improved from baseline to day 15 in all groups: MP+NTI (median score, 4.5; P = .005), PL+NTI (median score, 8.0; P < .001), MP+CTI (median score, 7.0; P = .004), and PL+CTI (median score, 5.0; P = .03). However, there were no significant differences in the median improvement in FACIT-F fatigue between the MP and PL groups (5.5 v 6.0, respectively; P = .69) and among all four groups (P = .16). Fatigue (P < .001), nausea (P = .01), depression (P = .02), anxiety (P = .01), drowsiness (P < .001), appetite (P = .009), sleep (P < .001), and feeling of well-being (P < .001), as measured by the ESAS, significantly improved in patients who received NTI. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events did not differ between MP and PL (40 of 93 patients v 29 of 97 patients, respectively; P = .06).

conclusionMP and NTI alone or combined were not superior to placebo in improving CRF.

Indexed as

CounselingAdministration, OralAdultAgedCentral Nervous System StimulantsDepressionDopamine Uptake InhibitorsFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMethylphenidateMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingSleep StagesCentral Nervous System StimulantsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID23690414
PMCPMC3691358
OpenAlexW2115706603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.