Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23690237›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2013

The impact of health literacy on desire for participation in healthcare, medical visit communication, and patient reported outcomes among patients with hypertension.

Hanan J Aboumatar, Kathryn A Carson, Mary Catherine Beach, Debra L Roter, Lisa A Cooper

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03548779 (North Carolina Genomic Evaluation by Next-generation Exome Sequencing, 2), which is not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03548779 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

North Carolina Genomic Evaluation by Next-generation Exome Sequencing, 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2018 to 2024Enrolled548ConditionsEpilepsy, Seizure, Neuromuscular Diseases, Brain MalformationArmsPre-visit prep, usual care + exome seq
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Interventions to support shared decision making for hypertension: A systematic review of controlled studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Tailored Approach to Sleep Health Education (TASHE): a randomized controlled trial of a web-based application.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Online cancer forums and complementary and alternative medicine in cancer care: effects of ehealth literacy and psychological distress on use and attitudes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanan J AboumatarArmstrong Institute for Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 750 East Pratt St., 15th floor, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA, Habouma1@jhmi.edu.
Kathryn A Carson
Mary Catherine Beach
Debra L Roter
Lisa A Cooper

Funding

TRAINING COREP50HL105187 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDEN, SHERITA HILL · 2010 to 2014
$9.8M
Patient-Physician Partnership to Improve HBP AdherenceR01HL069403 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LISA A · 2001 to 2004
$2.5M
Patient-Oriented Research in Cardiovascular DisparitiesK24HL083113 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LISA A · 2006 to 2015
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL083113NHLBI NIH HHS K24HL083113NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL105187NHLBI NIH HHS P50HL105187NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL069403NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL069403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow health literacy (HL) is associated with poor healthcare outcomes; mechanisms for these associations remain unclear.

objectiveTo elucidate how HL influences patients' interest in participating in healthcare, medical visit communication, and patient reported visit outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Cross-sectional study of enrollment data from a randomized controlled trial of interventions to improve patient adherence to hypertension treatments. Participants were 41 primary care physicians and 275 of their patients. Prior to the enrollment visit, physicians received a minimal intervention or communication skills training and patients received a minimal intervention or a pre-visit coaching session. This resulted in four intervention groups (minimal patient/minimal physician; minimal patient/intensive physician; intensive patient/minimal physician; and intensive patient/intensive physician). MEASUREMENTS: Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine; patients' desire for involvement in decision making; communication behaviors; patient ratings of participatory decision making (PDM), trust, and satisfaction.

resultsA lower percentage of patients with low versus adequate literacy had controlled blood pressure. Both groups were similarly interested in participating in medical decision making. Communication behaviors did not differ based on HL except for medical question asking by patients, which was lower among low literacy patients. This was particularly true in the intensive patient /intensive physician group (3.85 vs. 6.42 questions; p = 0.002). Overall, ratings of care didn't differ based on HL; however, in analyses stratified by intervention assignment, patients with low literacy in minimal physician intervention groups reported significantly lower PDM scores than adequate literacy patients.

conclusionsPatients with low and adequate literacy were similarly interested in participating in medical decision making. However, low literacy patients were less likely to experience PDM in their visits. Low literacy patients in the intensive physician intervention groups asked fewer medical questions. Patients with low literacy may be less able to respond to physicians' use of patient-centered communication approaches than adequate literacy patients.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth LiteracyHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionSelf ReportTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23690237
PMCPMC3797328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.