Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2014
Markers of inflammation after zoledronic acid redosing.
Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Phase Reactions After Intravenous Infusion of Zoledronic Acid in Japanese Patients with Osteoporosis: Sub-analyses of the Phase III ZONE Study.Calcified tissue international · 2021Trial
- Safety, pharmacokinetics, and changes in bone metabolism associated with zoledronic acid treatment in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2017Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The symptoms of acute phase response (APR) following the first infusion of zoledronic acid (ZA) are attenuated after re-administration. We investigated the reasons for this attenuation, focusing on the changes in several hormones, bone markers and markers of inflammation occurring after the second ZA injection in patients who had experienced a severe APR after their first ZA infusion. Twenty-two postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and severe symptoms of APR following the first ZA infusion were included in the study (group A1). A year later, the same women (possibly with a residual activity of ZA) were subjected to ZA re-administration (group A2). Urine NTx (uNTx), white blood cells, parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, phosphorus and several serum markers of inflammation were measured before (0) and at 1 and 2 days following the first as well as the second infusion. In group A1, the APR was associated with a significant increase in serum C-reactive protein (CRP), high-sensitive interleukin 6 (hsIL-6), high-sensitive tumor necrosis factor alpha (hsTNF-α) and cortisol within 24 h after the infusion. The majority of the patients in group A2 did not experience an APR and serum calcium, phosphorus, CRP, hsIL-6, hsTNF-α, and cortisol remained essentially unchanged throughout the study. In group A2, on day 0, the uNTx were significantly lower than in group A1. In group A1 the uNTx decreased by 69 and 78% from baseline on days 1 and 2, whereas in group A2, they decreased by 48 and 53% (p < 0.01), respectively. A positive correlation was found between the degree of uNTx decline from the baseline levels (Δ-uNTx) and hsTNF-α and between Δ-uNTx and CRP. The Δ-uNTx, reflecting the osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, may play some role in the APR appearance, although it must be excluded if the relationships of the changes between uNTx and hsTNF-α/CRP are coincidental effects and not causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.