ReviewInternational orthopaedics2013
Improvement of research quality in the fields of orthopaedics and trauma: a global perspective.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Publications From Saudi Arabia in Orthopedic Surgery in the Recent Six Years: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- The interobserver reliability of clinical relevance in orthopaedic research.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Article
- Will technology drive orthopaedic surgery in the future?International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Middle East Authors' Contribution to theArthroplasty today · 2022Article
- Rising within the leadership of an orthopaedic society: learning from the presidents.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Statistical Fragility of Surgical Clinical Trials in Orthopaedic Trauma.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021Review
- The Influence of Geographic Region on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Literature From 1988 to 2018.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021Article
- Impact of industry 4.0 to create advancements in orthopaedics.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2020Article
- Assessing the level of evidence in the orthopaedic literature, 2013-2018: a review of 3449 articles in leading orthopaedic journals.Patient safety in surgery · 2020Article
- Overview of randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic research: search for significant findings.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019Review
- Does the Hirsch Index Improve Research Quality in the Field of Biomaterials? A New Perspective in the Biomedical Research Field.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Increased cautiousness in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients concordant with syringomyelia fails to improve overall patient outcomes.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The international orthopaedic community aims to achieve the best possible outcome for patient care by constantly modifying surgical techniques and expanding the surgeon's knowledge. These efforts require proper reflection within a setting that necessitates a higher quality standard for global orthopaedic publication. Furthermore, these techniques demand that surgeons acquire information at a rapid rate while enforcing higher standards in research performance. An international consensus exists on how to perform research and what rules should be considered when publishing a scientific paper. Despite this global agreement, in today's "Cross Check Era", too many authors do not give attention to the current standards of systematic research. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to describe these performance standards, the available choices for orthopaedic surgeons and the current learning curve for seasoned teams of researchers and orthopaedic surgeons with more than three decades of experience. These lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the topics that will significantly influence the research development as we arrive at an important globalisation era in orthopaedics and trauma-related research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.