Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23689475›Full record

Trial reportJAMA pediatrics2013

The effect of increased coverage of participatory women's groups on neonatal mortality in Bangladesh: A cluster randomized trial.

Edward Fottrell, Kishwar Azad, Abdul Kuddus, Layla Younes, Sanjit Shaha, Tasmin Nahar, Bedowra Haq Aumon, Munir Hossen, James Beard, Tanvir Hossain and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 80 papers, 25 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 25 pooled it
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 25 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Edward FottrellInstitute for Global Health, University College London, England.
Kishwar Azad
Abdul Kuddus
Layla Younes
Sanjit Shaha
Tasmin Nahar
Bedowra Haq Aumon
Munir Hossen
James Beard
Tanvir Hossain
Anni-Maria Pulkki-Brannstrom
Jolene Skordis-Worrall
Audrey Prost
Anthony Costello
Tanja A J Houweling
University College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 085417Wellcome Trust 085417ma /Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceCommunity-based interventions can reduce neonatal mortality when health systems are weak. Population coverage of target groups may be an important determinant of their effect on behavior and mortality. A women's group trial at coverage of 1 group per 1414 population in rural Bangladesh showed no effect on neonatal mortality, despite a similar intervention having a significant effect on neonatal and maternal death in comparable settings.

objectiveTo assess the effect of a participatory women's group intervention with higher population coverage on neonatal mortality in Bangladesh.

designA cluster randomized controlled trial in 9 intervention and 9 control clusters.

settingRural Bangladesh.

participantsWomen permanently residing in 18 unions in 3 districts and accounting for 19 301 births during the final 24 months of the intervention.

interventionsWomen's groups at a coverage of 1 per 309 population that proceed through a participatory learning and action cycle in which they prioritize issues that affected maternal and neonatal health and design and implement strategies to address these issues. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Neonatal mortality rate.

resultsAnalysis included 19 301 births during the final 24 months of the intervention. More than one-third of newly pregnant women joined the groups. The neonatal mortality rate was significantly lower in the intervention arm (21.3 neonatal deaths per 1000 live births vs 30.1 per 1000 in control areas), a reduction in neonatal mortality of 38% (risk ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43-0.89]) when adjusted for socioeconomic factors. The cost-effectiveness was US $220 to $393 per year of life lost averted. Cause-specific mortality rates suggest reduced deaths due to infections and those associated with prematurity/low birth weight. Improvements were seen in hygienic home delivery practices, newborn thermal care, and breastfeeding practices. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Women's group community mobilization, delivered at adequate population coverage, is a highly cost-effective approach to improve newborn survival and health behavior indicators in rural Bangladesh.

trial registrationisrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN01805825.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityWomenAdolescentAdultBangladeshBayes TheoremCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesModels, StatisticalOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyRegression AnalysisRural Health Services

Identifiers

PMID23689475
PMCPMC5082727
OpenAlexW2119811053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.