Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23687948›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians2014

Poor pregnancy outcome in women with type 1 diabetes is predicted by elevated HbA1c and spikes of high glucose values in the third trimester.

Peter Damm, Henriette Mersebach, Jacob Råstam, Risto Kaaja, Moshe Hod, David R McCance, Elisabeth R Mathiesen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00365170 (A Randomised, Parallel-group, Open-label, Multinational Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Insulin Aspart), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00365170 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomised, Parallel-group, Open-label, Multinational Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Insulin Aspart (NovoRapid®) Versus Human Insulin (Actrapid®), Used in a Multiple Injection Regimen, in the Treatment of Pregnant Women With Type 1 Diabetes, Focusing on Maternal Hypoglycaemia and Pregnancy Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2002 to 2005Enrolled419ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Armshuman insulin, insulin aspart
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Is There a Role for HbA1c in Pregnancy?Current diabetes reports · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Application of glycated hemoglobin in the perinatal period.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Peter DammDepartments of Endocrinology and Obstetrics, Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark .
Henriette Mersebach
Jacob Råstam
Risto Kaaja
Moshe Hod
David R McCance
Elisabeth R Mathiesen
Center for Global Development · USSatakunta Central Hospital · FITel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse data from a randomised, controlled study of prandial insulin aspart versus human insulin, both with NPH insulin, in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes for potential factors predicting poor pregnancy outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN/

methodPost hoc analysis including 91 subjects randomised prior to pregnancy with known outcome in early pregnancy and 259 subjects randomised prior to pregnancy/during pregnancy of <10 weeks' gestation with known late-pregnancy outcomes. Poor early-pregnancy outcomes included fetal loss <22 gestational weeks and/or congenital malformation (n=18). Poor late-pregnancy outcomes included: composite endpoint including pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery and perinatal death (n=78); preterm delivery (n=63); and excessive fetal growth (n=88).

results18 patients experienced a malformed/lost fetus in early pregnancy - none preceded by severe hypoglycaemia. Albuminuria in early pregnancy was a significant predictor of poor late-pregnancy outcome (composite endpoint; p=0.012). In the third trimester, elevated HbA1c, ≥ 1 plasma glucose (PG) measurement >11 mmol/L (198 mg/dL) and %PG values outside 3.9-7.0 mmol/L (70-126 mg/dL) were significant predictors of poor late-pregnancy outcomes (all p<0.05).

conclusionsElevated HbA1c, high glucose spikes and out-of-range %PG in the third trimester, and albuminuria in early pregnancy, are associated with poor late-pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAdultAlbuminuriaBlood GlucoseCongenital AbnormalitiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleFetal DeathFoodGestational AgeGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinInsulin AspartInsulin, IsophanePre-EclampsiaBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinInsulinInsulin AspartInsulin, Isophane

Identifiers

PMID23687948
PMCPMC3877859
OpenAlexW2052390671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.