Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23687556›Full record

ArticleReviews in obstetrics & gynecology2013

Safety considerations for office-based obstetric and gynecologic procedures.

Richard D Urman, Nathan Punwani, Maryanne Bombaugh, Fred E Shapiro

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03547778 (Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol For Pain Relief During Office Hysteroscopy and Endometrial Biopsy; A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03547778 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol For Pain Relief During Office Hysteroscopy and Endometrial Biopsy; A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of South FloridaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled0ConditionsOffice Hysteroscopy and Endometrial BiopsyArmsMisoprostol 50 mcg pesssary, Placebos
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard D UrmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Nathan Punwani
Maryanne Bombaugh
Fred E Shapiro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The migration of gynecologic procedures to office-based settings provides numerous advantages for patients and providers alike, including reduced patient expenses, improved scheduling convenience, favorable provider reimbursement, and enhanced continuity of care and patient satisfaction. With rising health care costs-a major concern in health care-procedures will continue to shift to practice environments that optimize care, quality, value, and efficiency. It is imperative that gynecologic offices ensure that performance and quality variations are minimized across different sites of care; physicians should strive to provide care to patients that optimizes safety and is at least equivalent to that delivered at traditional sites. The gynecologic community should nonetheless heed the Institute of Medicine's recommendations and embrace continuous quality improvement. By exercising leadership, office-based gynecologists can forge a culture of competency, teamwork, communication, and performance measurement.

Indexed as

Gynecological proceduresOffice-based settingSafety

Identifiers

PMID23687556
PMCPMC3651543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.