Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23687412›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clip: including complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Noriko Nishiyama, Hirohito Mori, Hideki Kobara, Kazi Rafiq, Shintarou Fujihara, Mitsuyoshi Kobayashi, Makoto Oryu, Tsutomu Masaki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03065465 (Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03065465 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Standard Endoscopic Hemostasis Compared to OVESCO for Severe Non-variceal UGI Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorCURE Digestive Diseases Research CenterRan2015 to 2025Enrolled65ConditionsUpper Gastrointestinal HemorrhageArmsOver-the-scope hemoclipping device, Standard endoscopic treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Endoscopic tacking system as a novel tissue approximation measure for very large EMR defects.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Minimally invasive management of esophageal perforation.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noriko NishiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa 761-0796, Japan. n-nori@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
Hirohito Mori
Hideki Kobara
Kazi Rafiq
Shintarou Fujihara
Mitsuyoshi Kobayashi
Makoto Oryu
Tsutomu Masaki
Kagawa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo retrospectively review the results of over-the-scope clip (OTSC) use in our hospital and to examine the feasibility of using the OTSC to treat perforations after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

methodsWe enrolled 23 patients who presented with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, fistulae and perforations and were treated with OTSCs (Ovesco Endoscopy GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) between November 2011 and September 2012. Maximum lesion size was defined as lesion diameter. The number of OTSCs to be used per patient was not decided until the lesion was completely closed. We used a twin grasper (Ovesco Endoscopy GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany) as a grasping device for all the patients. A 9 mm OTSC was chosen for use in the esophagus and colon, and a 10 mm device was used for the stomach, duodenum and rectum. The overall success rate and complications were evaluated, with a particular emphasis on patients who had undergone ESD due to adenocarcinoma. In technical successful cases we included not only complete closing by using OTSCs, but also partial closing where complete closure with OTSCs is almost difficult. In overall clinical successful cases we included only complete closing by using only OTSCs perfectly. All the OTSCs were placed by 2 experienced endoscopists. The sites closed after ESD included not only the perforation site but also all defective ulcers sites.

resultsA total of 23 patients [mean age 77 years (range 64-98 years)] underwent OTSC placement during the study period. The indications for OTSC placement were GI bleeding (n = 9), perforation (n = 10), fistula (n = 4) and the prevention of post-ESD duodenal artificial ulcer perforation (n = 1). One patient had a perforation caused by a glycerin enema, after which a fistula formed. Lesion closure using the OTSC alone was successful in 19 out of 23 patients, and overall success rate was 82.6%. A large lesion size (greater than 20 mm) and a delayed diagnosis (more than 1 wk) were the major contributing factors for the overall unsuccessful clinical cases. The location of the unsuccessful lesion was in the stomach. The median operation time in the successful cases was 18 min, and the average observation time was 67 d. During the observation period, none of the patients experienced any complications associated with OTSC placement. In addition, we successfully used the OTSC to close the perforation site after ESD in 6 patients. This was a single-center, retrospective study with a small sample size.

conclusionThe OTSC is effective for treating GI bleeding, fistulae as well as perforations, and the OTSC technique proofed effective treatment for perforation after ESD.

Indexed as

Surgical InstrumentsAgedAged, 80 and overDigestive System FistulaDissectionEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHemostasis, EndoscopicHumansIntestinal PerforationMaleMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryEndoscopic submucosal dissection complicationsGastrointestinal bleedingGastrointestinal fistulaeGastrointestinal perforationOver-the-scope clip

Identifiers

PMID23687412
PMCPMC3653149
OpenAlexW2126107554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.