Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23687407›Full record

ArticleApplied magnetic resonance2013

Optimization of pulsed DEER measurements for Gd-based labels: choice of operational frequencies, pulse durations and positions, and temperature.

A Raitsimring, A V Astashkin, J H Enemark, I Kaminker, D Goldfarb, E D Walter, Y Song, T J Meade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied magnetic resonance, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. High-sensitivity GdMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A RaitsimringDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0041, USA.
A V Astashkin
J H Enemark
I Kaminker
D Goldfarb
E D Walter
Y Song
T J Meade

Funding

Theranostic Magnetic Nanostructures for the Molecular Imaging of CancerU54CA151880 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MIRKIN, CHAD A. · 2010 to 2014
$11.5M
q-Modulated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast AgentsR01EB005866 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MEADE, THOMAS J · 2005 to 2013
$2.2M
UPGRADE OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY PULSED EPR FACILITY: BIOCHEMISTRYS10RR020959 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ENEMARK, JOHN H · 2005 to 2005
$205k
Real-Time Three-Dimensional Motion Control TrackerR43EB000586 · NIBIB · PHYSICAL SCIENCES, INC · PI HAMMER, DANIEL X · 2003 to 2003
$102k
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151880NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR020959NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005866NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB000586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, the experimental conditions and parameters necessary to optimize the long-distance (≥ 60 Å) Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) measurements of biomacromolecules labeled with Gd(III) tags are analyzed. The specific parameters discussed are the temperature, microwave band, the separation between the pumping and observation frequencies, pulse train repetition rate, pulse durations and pulse positioning in the electron paramagnetic resonance spectrum. It was found that: (i) in optimized DEER measurements, the observation pulses have to be applied at the maximum of the EPR spectrum; (ii) the optimal temperature range for K

Indexed as

Gd(III) spin labelsKa -and W-microwave bandslong distance pulsed DEER

Identifiers

PMID23687407
PMCPMC3654798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.