Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23687277›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2013

Mutational analysis of the multiple-antibiotic resistance regulator MarR reveals a ligand binding pocket at the interface between the dimerization and DNA binding domains.

Valérie Duval, Laura M McMurry, Kimberly Foster, James F Head, Stuart B Levy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeting MarA N-terminal domain dynamics to prevent DNA binding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cotranslational folding allows misfolding-prone proteins to circumvent deep kinetic traps.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Valérie DuvalCenter for Adaptation Genetics and Drug Resistance, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Laura M McMurry
Kimberly Foster
James F Head
Stuart B Levy
Tufts University · USBoston University · US

Funding

The multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR)regulonR01AI056021 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI LEVY, STUART B. · 2003 to 2017
$8.9M
NIAID NIH HHS AI56021NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI056021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Escherichia coli regulator MarR represses the multiple-antibiotic resistance operon marRAB and responds to phenolic compounds, including sodium salicylate, which inhibit its activity. Crystals obtained in the presence of a high concentration of salicylate indicated two possible salicylate sites, SAL-A and SAL-B. However, it was unclear whether these sites were physiologically significant or were simply a result of the crystallization conditions. A study carried out on MarR homologue MTH313 suggested the presence of a salicylate binding site buried at the interface between the dimerization and the DNA-binding domains. Interestingly, the authors of the study indicated a similar pocket conserved in the MarR structure. Since no mutagenesis analysis had been performed to test which amino acids were essential in salicylate binding, we examined the role of residues that could potentially interact with salicylate. We demonstrated that mutations in residues shown as interacting with salicylate at SAL-A and SAL-B in the MarR-salicylate structure had no effect on salicylate binding, indicating that these sites were not the physiological regulatory sites. However, some of these residues (P57, R86, M74, and R77) were important for DNA binding. Furthermore, mutations in residues R16, D26, and K44 significantly reduced binding to both salicylate and 2,4-dinitrophenol, while a mutation in residue H19 impaired the binding to 2,4-dinitrophenol only. These findings indicate, as for MTH313, the presence of a ligand binding pocket located between the dimerization and DNA binding domains.

Indexed as

2,4-DinitrophenolAnti-Bacterial AgentsBinding SitesDNA, BacterialDNA Mutational AnalysisEscherichia coli ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, TertiaryRepressor ProteinsSodium Salicylate2,4-DinitrophenolAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsMarR protein, E coliRepressor ProteinsSodium Salicylate

Identifiers

PMID23687277
PMCPMC3719538
OpenAlexW2139099023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.