Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23686935›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Toward creation of a cancer drug toxicity knowledge base: automatically extracting cancer drug-side effect relationships from the literature.

Rong Xu, QuanQiu Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. tcTKB: an integrated cardiovascular toxicity knowledge base for targeted cancer drugs.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PubMedMiner: Mining and Visualizing MeSH-based Associations in PubMed.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rong XuMedical Informatics Program, Center for Clinical Investigation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
QuanQiu Wang
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024989 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PAMELA B · 2007 to 2011
$53.7M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA comprehensive and machine-understandable cancer drug-side effect (drug-SE) relationship knowledge base is important for in silico cancer drug target discovery, drug repurposing, and toxicity predication, and for personalized risk-benefit decisions by cancer patients. While US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels capture well-known cancer drug SE information, much cancer drug SE knowledge remains buried the published biomedical literature. We present a relationship extraction approach to extract cancer drug-SE pairs from the literature. DATA AND

methodsWe used 21,354,075 MEDLINE records as the text corpus. We extracted drug-SE co-occurrence pairs using a cancer drug lexicon and a clean SE lexicon that we created. We then developed two filtering approaches to remove drug-disease treatment pairs and subsequently a ranking scheme to further prioritize filtered pairs. Finally, we analyzed relationships among SEs, gene targets, and indications.

resultsWe extracted 56,602 cancer drug-SE pairs. The filtering algorithms improved the precision of extracted pairs from 0.252 at baseline to 0.426, representing a 69% improvement in precision with no decrease in recall. The ranking algorithm further prioritized filtered pairs and achieved a precision of 0.778 for top-ranked pairs. We showed that cancer drugs that share SEs tend to have overlapping gene targets and overlapping indications.

conclusionsThe relationship extraction approach is effective in extracting many cancer drug-SE pairs from the literature. This unique knowledge base, when combined with existing cancer drug SE knowledge, can facilitate drug target discovery, drug repurposing, and toxicity prediction.

Indexed as

Knowledge BasesMEDLINEAntineoplastic AgentsData MiningHumansAntineoplastic AgentsCancer Drug ToxicityDrug RepurposingDrug Target DiscoveryInformation ExtractionNatural Language ProcessingText Mining

Identifiers

PMID23686935
PMCPMC3912715
OpenAlexW2105116696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.