ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Toward creation of a cancer drug toxicity knowledge base: automatically extracting cancer drug-side effect relationships from the literature.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Constructing a knowledge-based heterogeneous information graph for medical health status classification.Health information science and systems · 2020Article
- Immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs): extraction from FDA drug labels and comparative analysis.JAMIA open · 2019Article
- Large-scale automatic extraction of side effects associated with targeted anticancer drugs from full-text oncological articles.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- Comparing a knowledge-driven approach to a supervised machine learning approach in large-scale extraction of drug-side effect relationships from free-text biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- tcTKB: an integrated cardiovascular toxicity knowledge base for targeted cancer drugs.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015Article
- Big data: the next frontier for innovation in therapeutics and healthcare.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2014Review
- Automatic signal extraction, prioritizing and filtering approaches in detecting post-marketing cardiovascular events associated with targeted cancer drugs from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Journal of biomedical informatics · 2014Article
- Large-scale combining signals from both biomedical literature and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to improve post-marketing drug safety signal detection.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- PubMedMiner: Mining and Visualizing MeSH-based Associations in PubMed.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014Article
- Computational advances in cancer informatics (a).Cancer informatics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA comprehensive and machine-understandable cancer drug-side effect (drug-SE) relationship knowledge base is important for in silico cancer drug target discovery, drug repurposing, and toxicity predication, and for personalized risk-benefit decisions by cancer patients. While US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels capture well-known cancer drug SE information, much cancer drug SE knowledge remains buried the published biomedical literature. We present a relationship extraction approach to extract cancer drug-SE pairs from the literature. DATA AND
methodsWe used 21,354,075 MEDLINE records as the text corpus. We extracted drug-SE co-occurrence pairs using a cancer drug lexicon and a clean SE lexicon that we created. We then developed two filtering approaches to remove drug-disease treatment pairs and subsequently a ranking scheme to further prioritize filtered pairs. Finally, we analyzed relationships among SEs, gene targets, and indications.
resultsWe extracted 56,602 cancer drug-SE pairs. The filtering algorithms improved the precision of extracted pairs from 0.252 at baseline to 0.426, representing a 69% improvement in precision with no decrease in recall. The ranking algorithm further prioritized filtered pairs and achieved a precision of 0.778 for top-ranked pairs. We showed that cancer drugs that share SEs tend to have overlapping gene targets and overlapping indications.
conclusionsThe relationship extraction approach is effective in extracting many cancer drug-SE pairs from the literature. This unique knowledge base, when combined with existing cancer drug SE knowledge, can facilitate drug target discovery, drug repurposing, and toxicity prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.