SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2014
Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis.
Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03990714 (Intracorporeal Vs Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intracorporeal Vs Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (The IVEA-study)
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis after minimally invasive right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intra-versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis of 3699 patients.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Pooled it
- Recovery after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2018Pooled it
- A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Pooled it
- Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction-colectomy: a systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Surgical stress and metabolic response after totally laparoscopic right colectomy.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Elevating surgical standards: The role of intraperitoneal isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis in colon cancer surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Minimizing incisional hernia: intracorporeal anastomosis makes the difference after laparoscopic right colectomy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- COLOR IV: a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Short-term Outcomes of Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Totally Stapled Anastomosis after Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025Article
- Article
- Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study).The British journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Best Evidence for Each Surgical Step in Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023Review
- National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study).Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Article
- Effect of intracorporeal anastomosis on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic right colectomy.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023Article
- Intraoperative and postoperative short-term outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Right colectomy from open to robotic - a single-center experience with functional outcomes in a learning-curve setting.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of its technical difficulty, totally laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is performed only by a small number of surgeons and most of them use a laparoscopic-assisted technique with extracorporeal anastomosis. This systematic review aims to evaluate differences in outcomes of patients undergoing right laparoscopic colectomy, either with intracorporeal or extracorporeal anastomosis. Electronic databases were searched for studies published between 1991 and 2012. Randomized controlled trials and case-control studies comparing intracorporeal to extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy were included in the systematic review. Meta-analytical models were used to evaluate anastomotic leak rate and short-term overall morbidity. Defined primary outcomes of interest were operating time, conversion rate, return of bowel function, anastomotic leak rate, and length of hospital stay. Randomized controlled trials were not found, confirming the paucity of the literature on this topic. Six case-control studies were identified involving 484 patients undergoing right laparoscopic colectomy, 272 with intracorporeal and 212 with extracorporeal anastomosis. Best outcomes seem to be associated with totally laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis, especially in terms of return of bowel function, length of hospital stay, and cosmetic results. However, our meta-analysis did not show a significant difference between the two techniques in terms of anastomotic leak rate (OR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.30-3.15) or for short-term overall morbidity (OR 0.68; 95 % CI 0.41-1.12). Comparative analysis of outcomes is in favor of intracorporeal anastomosis. However, the meta-analysis results do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions. Further prospective randomized trials are necessary to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23686680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.