Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23686510›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2013

Decreasing disparities in breast cancer screening in refugee women using culturally tailored patient navigation.

Sanja Percac-Lima, Jeffrey M Ashburner, Barbara Bond, Sarah A Oo, Steven J Atlas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02553538 (Improving Comprehensive Cancer Screening Among Vulnerable Patients Using Patient Navigation as Part of a Population-Based Health IT System), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02553538 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Improving Comprehensive Cancer Screening Among Vulnerable Patients Using Patient Navigation as Part of a Population-Based Health IT System: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2014 to 2014Enrolled1,612ConditionsPatient ComplianceArmsPatient Navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Improving primary health care quality for refugees and asylum seekers: A systematic review of interventional approaches.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Community Health Navigators for Cancer Screening Among Deaf, Deafblind, and Hard of Hearing Adults Who Use American Sign Language.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanja Percac-LimaMassachusetts General Hospital Chelsea HealthCare Center, 151 Everett Avenue, Chelsea, MA, 02150, USA, spercaclima@partners.org.
Jeffrey M Ashburner
Barbara Bond
Sarah A Oo
Steven J Atlas

Funding

Technology for Optimizing Population Care in a Resource-limited EnvironmentR18HS018161 · AHRQ · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ATLAS, STEVEN J · 2009 to 2011
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS018161Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient navigator (PN) programs can improve breast cancer screening in low income, ethnic/racial minorities. Refugee women have low breast cancer screening rates, but it has not been shown that PN is similarly effective.

objectiveEvaluate whether a PN program for refugee women decreases disparities in breast cancer screening.

designRetrospective program evaluation of an implemented intervention.

participantsWomen who self-identified as speaking Somali, Arabic, or Serbo-Croatian (Bosnian) and were eligible for breast cancer screening at an urban community health center (HC). Comparison groups were English-speaking and Spanish-speaking women eligible for breast cancer screening in the same HC.

interventionPatient navigators educated women about breast cancer screening, explored barriers to screening, and tailored interventions individually to help complete screening. MAIN MEASURES: Adjusted 2-year mammography rates from logistic regression models for each calendar year accounting for clustering by primary care physician. Rates in refugee women were compared to English-speaking and Spanish-speaking women in the year before implementation of the PN program and over its first 3 years.

resultsThere were 188 refugee (36 Somali, 48 Arabic, 104 Serbo-Croatian speaking), 2,072 English-speaking, and 2,014 Spanish-speaking women eligible for breast cancer screening over the 4-year study period. In the year prior to implementation of the program, adjusted mammography rates were lower among refugee women (64.1 %, 95 % CI: 49-77 %) compared to English-speaking (76.5 %, 95 % CI: 69 %-83 %) and Spanish-speaking (85.2 %, 95 % CI: 79 %-90 %) women. By the end of 2011, screening rates increased in refugee women (81.2 %, 95 % CI: 72 %-88 %), and were similar to the rates in English-speaking (80.0 %, 95 % CI: 73 %-86 %) and Spanish-speaking (87.6 %, 95 % CI: 82 %-91 %) women. PN increased screening rates in both younger and older refugee women.

conclusionLinguistically and culturally tailored PN decreased disparities over time in breast cancer screening among female refugees from Somalia, the Middle East and Bosnia.

Indexed as

RefugeesAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCultural CharacteristicsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPatient NavigationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID23686510
PMCPMC3797343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.