Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23686414›Full record

Trial reportArthritis and rheumatism2013

Validation of the methotrexate-first strategy in patients with early, poor-prognosis rheumatoid arthritis: results from a two-year randomized, double-blind trial.

James R O'Dell, Jeffrey R Curtis, Ted R Mikuls, Stacey S Cofield, S Louis Bridges, Veena K Ranganath, Larry W Moreland, TEAR Trial Investigators

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis and rheumatism, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of methotrexate in reducing the risk of bone erosion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James R O'DellUniversity of Nebraska and Omaha VA Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3025, USA. jrodell@unmc.edu
Jeffrey R Curtis
Ted R Mikuls
Stacey S Cofield
S Louis Bridges
Veena K Ranganath
Larry W Moreland
TEAR Trial Investigators

Funding

Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness & Safety of Biologics in AutoimmunityR01HS018517 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CURTIS, JEFFREY R. · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
Predictors of Treatment Response in Early Aggressive RAR01AR052658 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BRIDGES, S LOUIS · 2004 to 2007
$1.2M
Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Fracture and Vascular DiseaseK23AR053351 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CURTIS, JEFFREY R. · 2007 to 2011
$755k
Biomarkers for Early Therapeutic Response in Older RA PatientsK23AR057818 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RANGANATH, VEENA K · 2010 to 2014
$607k
Rheumatoid Arthritis Induction Trial (RAITMAT)R34AR055122 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORELAND, LARRY W · 2007 to 2007
$149k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS018517AHRQ HHS R01-HS-018517NIAMS NIH HHS 1-R34-AR-055122NIAMS NIH HHS 5K23-AR-057818NIAMS NIH HHS AR-053351NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR053351NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR057818NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052658NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR-052658NIAMS NIH HHS R34 AR055122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMethotrexate (MTX) taken as monotherapy is recommended as the initial disease-modifying antirheumatic drug for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes of a blinded trial of initial MTX monotherapy with the option to step-up to combination therapy as compared to immediate combination therapy in patients with early, poor-prognosis RA.

methodsIn the Treatment of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (TEAR) trial, 755 participants with early, poor-prognosis RA were randomized to receive MTX monotherapy or combination therapy (MTX plus etanercept or MTX plus sulfasalazine plus hydroxychloroquine). Participants randomized to receive MTX monotherapy stepped-up to combination therapy at 24 weeks if the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was ≥3.2.

resultsAttrition at 24 weeks was similar in the MTX monotherapy and combination groups. Of the 370 evaluable participants in the initial MTX group, 28% achieved low levels of disease activity and did not step-up to combination therapy (MTX monotherapy group). The mean ± SD DAS28-ESR in participants continuing to take MTX monotherapy at week 102 was 2.7 ± 1.2, which is similar to that in participants who were randomized to immediate combination therapy (2.9 ± 1.2). Participants who received MTX monotherapy had less radiographic progression at week 102 as compared to those who received immediate combination therapy (mean ± SD change in modified Sharp score 0.2 ± 1.1 versus 1.1 ± 6.4). Participants assigned to initial MTX who required step-up to combination therapy at 24 weeks (72%) demonstrated similar DAS28-ESR values (3.5 ± 1.3 versus 3.2 ± 1.3 at week 48) and radiographic progression (change in modified Sharp score 1.2 ± 4.1 versus 1.1 ± 6.4 at week 102) as those assigned to immediate combination therapy. The results for either of the immediate combination approaches, whether triple therapy or MTX plus etanercept, were similar.

conclusionThese results in patients with early, poor prognosis RA validate the strategy of starting with MTX monotherapy. This study is the first to demonstrate in a blinded trial that initial MTX monotherapy with the option to step-up to combination therapy results in similar outcomes to immediate combination therapy. Approximately 30% of patients will not need combination therapy, and the 70% who will need it are clinically and radiographically indistinguishable from those who were randomized to receive immediate combination therapy.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEtanerceptFemaleHealth StatusHumansHydroxychloroquineImmunoglobulin GJointsMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedPrognosisAntirheumatic AgentsEtanerceptHydroxychloroquineImmunoglobulin GMethotrexateReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorSulfasalazine

Identifiers

PMID23686414
PMCPMC4768726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.