Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23686385›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomolecular NMR2013

Fragment-based drug discovery using NMR spectroscopy.

Mary J Harner, Andreas O Frank, Stephen W Fesik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rapid Fragment Screening byAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Combining MicroED and native mass spectrometry for structural discovery of enzyme-small molecule complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Perspectives on Applications ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary J HarnerDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2215 Garland Ave, 607 Light Hall, Nashville, TN 37232-0146, USA.
Andreas O Frank
Stephen W Fesik

Funding

The Vanderbilt Molecular Target Discovery and Development CenterRC2CA148375 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MARNETT, LAWRENCE J. · 2009 to 2010
$4.7M
Expanding the druggable genomeDP1CA174419 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FESIK, STEPHEN W. · 2012 to 2014
$2.3M
Expanding the druggable genomeDP1OD006933 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FESIK, STEPHEN W. · 2010 to 2011
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS 5DP1OD006933/8DP1CA174419NCI NIH HHS 5RC2CA148375NCI NIH HHS DP1 CA174419NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148375NIH HHS DP1 OD006933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has evolved into a powerful tool for fragment-based drug discovery over the last two decades. While NMR has been traditionally used to elucidate the three-dimensional structures and dynamics of biomacromolecules and their interactions, it can also be a very valuable tool for the reliable identification of small molecules that bind to proteins and for hit-to-lead optimization. Here, we describe the use of NMR spectroscopy as a method for fragment-based drug discovery and how to most effectively utilize this approach for discovering novel therapeutics based on our experience.

Indexed as

LigandsNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularDrug DiscoveryProtein BindingProteinsSmall Molecule LibrariesLigandsProteinsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID23686385
PMCPMC3699969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.