ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2013
Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.
Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Pooled it
- Clinical exome sequencing vs. usual care for hereditary colorectal cancer diagnosis: A pilot comparative effectiveness study.Contemporary clinical trials · 2019Trial
- Disclosing Pleiotropic Effects During Genetic Risk Assessment for Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2016Trial
- When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.AJOB empirical bioethicsTrial
- Historical Perspectives, Classification and Diagnostic Approaches of Inborn Errors of Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Metabolites · 2026Review
- A randomized study of digital versus genetic counselor return of actionable genetic research results to biobank participants (RESPECT3 study).BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Decision stability among adolescents and young adults making choices about learning genomic research results.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Culturally safe and ethical biomarker and genomic research with Indigenous peoples-a scoping review.BMC global and public health · 2024Article
- Islamic Viewpoints on Opportunistic Sex Selection of IVF Embryos upon doing Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Preventing Genetic Diseases.Asian bioethics review · 2024Article
- Return of Participants' Incidental Genetic Research Findings: Experience from a Case-Control Study of Asthma in an American Indian Community.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Return of Participants' Incidental Genetic Research Findings: Experience from a Case-Control Study of Asthma in an American Indian Community.Research square · 2023Article
- Privacy and ethical challenges of the Amelogenin sex test in forensic paternity/kinship analysis: Insights from a 13-year case history.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Article
- Precision Medicine: Historiography of Life Sciences and the Geneticization of the Clinics.Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Genetic Kidney Diseases in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Towards Precision Genomic Medicine in Donor Risk Assessment.Current transplantation reports · 2022Article
- Public interest in unexpected genomic findings: a survey study identifying aspects of sequencing attitudes that influence preferences.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Exploring the motivations of research participants who chose not to learn medically actionable secondary genetic findings about themselves.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Behavioral and psychological impact of genome sequencing: a pilot randomized trial of primary care and cardiology patients.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Article
- Levenshtein Distance, Sequence Comparison and Biological Database Search.IEEE transactions on information theory · 2021Article
- Opportunistic genomic screening. Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.