ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2013
Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.
Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01736566 (The MedSeq Project Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The MedSeq Project Pilot Study: Integrating Whole Genome Sequencing Into the Practice of Clinical Medicine
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Pooled it
- Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health.Pediatrics · 2017Trial
- Disclosing Pleiotropic Effects During Genetic Risk Assessment for Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2016Trial
- When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing.AJOB empirical bioethicsTrial
- Pharmacovigilance in Cell and Gene Therapy: Evolving Challenges in Risk Management and Long-Term Follow-Up.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Normative Issues in Next Generation Sequencing Gene Testing.Development & reproduction · 2023Article
- Newborn Screening for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2023Review
- Privacy and ethical challenges of the Amelogenin sex test in forensic paternity/kinship analysis: Insights from a 13-year case history.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- Public interest in unexpected genomic findings: a survey study identifying aspects of sequencing attitudes that influence preferences.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- From newborn screening to genomic medicine: challenges and suggestions on how to incorporate genomic newborn screening in public health programs.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2022Article
- Opportunistic genomic screening. Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- Perceptions of best practices for return of results in an international survey of psychiatric genetics researchers.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- Practices and Attitudes toward Returning Genomic Research Results to Low-Resource Research Participants.Public health genomics · 2021Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening: A Review of Current State.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Attitudes toward and current status of disclosure of secondary findings from next-generation sequencing: a nation-wide survey of clinical genetics professionals in Japan.Journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- An ethical framework for genetic counseling in the genomic era.Journal of genetic counseling · 2020Article
- Predictive Analytics and the Return of "Research" Information to Participants.Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference · 2020Article
- Article
- A proposal on the first Japanese practical guidance for the return of individual genomic results in research settings.Journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.