Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23685992›Full record

SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2013

[Topical pain therapy in oral mucositis: a systematic review].

H Bornemann-Cimenti, S K Kobald, I S Szilagyi, A Sandner-Kiesling

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H Bornemann-CimentiUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Medizinische Universität Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 29, 8036, Graz, Österreich.
S K Kobald
I S Szilagyi
A Sandner-Kiesling
Medical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pain provoked by mucositis is often described as the most excruciating symptom of cancer treatment. It often causes reduced ingestion, malnutrition, and sometimes postponement or withdrawal of the therapy. For health care providers, adequate pain treatment is a major challenge. The aim of this article is to present an overview of studies on the topical treatment of mucositis pain.

methodsA systematic search was performed in PubMed with the keywords "mucositis" "pain" and "topical" or "local". In addition, reference lists and relevant websites were scanned for appropriate literature.

resultsA total of 47 articles were included. There is only scarce evidence for the topical treatment of mucositis pain. The most convincing studies tested opioids, corticoids and benzydamine. For the other substances, too few studies were performed, the results were contradictory, or the study quality was low.

conclusionBased on the information gathered in this systematic search of the literature, topical treatment of mucositis pain today is based on empiricism and not on scientific evidence.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDose-Response Relationship, DrugEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStomatitisAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID23685992
OpenAlexW71965231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.