Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23685885›Full record

ArticleNature methods2013

Comparative analysis of RNA sequencing methods for degraded or low-input samples.

Xian Adiconis, Diego Borges-Rivera, Rahul Satija, David S DeLuca, Michele A Busby, Aaron M Berlin, Andrey Sivachenko, Dawn Anne Thompson, Alec Wysoker, Timothy Fennell and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 307 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
307citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

307 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. FFPE-CUTAC: A Single Assay, Multiple Layers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Low-volumeMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. ACSS2/AATF Drives Soluble FasL-Mediated CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article

247 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xian AdiconisBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Diego Borges-Rivera
Rahul Satija
David S DeLuca
Michele A Busby
Aaron M Berlin
Andrey Sivachenko
Dawn Anne Thompson
Alec Wysoker
Timothy Fennell
Andreas Gnirke
Nathalie Pochet
Aviv Regev
Joshua Z Levin

Funding

Large Scale Sequencing and Analysis of GenomesU54HG003067 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABRIEL, STACEY, LANDER, ERIC S · 2004 to 2015
$568.6M
Center for Cell CircuitsP50HG006193 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI REGEV, AVIV · 2011 to 2015
$15.6M
GenomeSpace: A community web environment for integrative genomic analysisP01HG005062 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI MESIROV, JILL P. · 2009 to 2013
$9.1M
The temporal reconfiguration of regulatory networks: From yeast to cancerDP1OD003958 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI REGEV, AVIV · 2008 to 2011
$3.3M
The chromatin regulatory circuitry of bivalent domainsF32HD075541 · NICHD · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SATIJA, RAHUL · 2013 to 2014
$99k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS 1P01HG005062-01NHGRI NIH HHS 1P50HG006193-01NHGRI NIH HHS HG03067NHGRI NIH HHS P01 HG005062NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG006193NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003067NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD075541NIH HHS DP1 OD003958NIH HHS DP1-OD003958-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-seq is an effective method for studying the transcriptome, but it can be difficult to apply to scarce or degraded RNA from fixed clinical samples, rare cell populations or cadavers. Recent studies have proposed several methods for RNA-seq of low-quality and/or low-quantity samples, but the relative merits of these methods have not been systematically analyzed. Here we compare five such methods using metrics relevant to transcriptome annotation, transcript discovery and gene expression. Using a single human RNA sample, we constructed and sequenced ten libraries with these methods and compared them against two control libraries. We found that the RNase H method performed best for chemically fragmented, low-quality RNA, and we confirmed this through analysis of actual degraded samples. RNase H can even effectively replace oligo(dT)-based methods for standard RNA-seq. SMART and NuGEN had distinct strengths for measuring low-quantity RNA. Our analysis allows biologists to select the most suitable methods and provides a benchmark for future method development.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsSample SizeSoftwareGene Expression ProfilingRNASequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeRNA

Identifiers

PMID23685885
PMCPMC3821180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.