ReviewSkeletal radiology2013
Imaging evaluation of inflammation in the musculoskeletal system: current concepts and perspectives.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound guidance in the surgical removal of internal fixators after complete healing of limb fractures.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Periodontal evaluation using a non-invasive imaging method (ultrasonography).Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2019Article
- Detection of pediatric musculoskeletal pathology using the fluid-sensitive sequence.Pediatric radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammation is the non-specific stereotyped reaction of the musculoskeletal system to various types of aggression, such as infection, tumor, autoimmune diseases, or trauma. Precise evaluation and, increasingly, reliable quantification of inflammation are now key factors for optimal patient management, as targeted therapies (e.g., anti-angiogenesis, anti-macrophages, anti-cytokines) are emerging as everyday drugs. In current practice, inflammation is evaluated mostly using MRI and US on the basis of its non-specific extracellular component due to the increased volume of free water. Inflamed tissue is described as areas of low T1 signal and high T2 signal on magnetic resonance imaging or as hypoechogenic areas on ultrasound imaging, and the evaluation of the increased tissue vascularity can be performed using gadolinium-enhanced MRI or power Doppler US. Emerging new imaging tools, regrouped under the label "cellular and molecular imaging" and defined as the in vivo characterization and measurement of biologic processes at the cellular and molecular level, demonstrate the possible shift of medical imaging from a macroscopic and non-specific level to a microscopic and targeted scale. Cellular and molecular imaging now allows the investigation of specific pathways involved in inflammation (e.g., angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and recruitment, proteases generation, metabolism, gene expression). PET and SPECT imaging are the most commonly used "molecular" imaging modalities, but recent progress in MR, US, and optical imaging has been made. In the future, those techniques might enable a detection of inflammation at its very early stage, its quantification through the definition of biomarkers, and possibly demonstrate the response to therapy at molecular and cellular levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.