Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23685709›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2013

Imaging evaluation of inflammation in the musculoskeletal system: current concepts and perspectives.

Guillaume Bierry, Jean-Louis Dietemann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guillaume BierryDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 10 Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg, France. guillaume.bierry@chru-strasbourg.fr
Jean-Louis Dietemann
Université de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation is the non-specific stereotyped reaction of the musculoskeletal system to various types of aggression, such as infection, tumor, autoimmune diseases, or trauma. Precise evaluation and, increasingly, reliable quantification of inflammation are now key factors for optimal patient management, as targeted therapies (e.g., anti-angiogenesis, anti-macrophages, anti-cytokines) are emerging as everyday drugs. In current practice, inflammation is evaluated mostly using MRI and US on the basis of its non-specific extracellular component due to the increased volume of free water. Inflamed tissue is described as areas of low T1 signal and high T2 signal on magnetic resonance imaging or as hypoechogenic areas on ultrasound imaging, and the evaluation of the increased tissue vascularity can be performed using gadolinium-enhanced MRI or power Doppler US. Emerging new imaging tools, regrouped under the label "cellular and molecular imaging" and defined as the in vivo characterization and measurement of biologic processes at the cellular and molecular level, demonstrate the possible shift of medical imaging from a macroscopic and non-specific level to a microscopic and targeted scale. Cellular and molecular imaging now allows the investigation of specific pathways involved in inflammation (e.g., angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and recruitment, proteases generation, metabolism, gene expression). PET and SPECT imaging are the most commonly used "molecular" imaging modalities, but recent progress in MR, US, and optical imaging has been made. In the future, those techniques might enable a detection of inflammation at its very early stage, its quantification through the definition of biomarkers, and possibly demonstrate the response to therapy at molecular and cellular levels.

Indexed as

HumansInflammationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMolecular ImagingMusculoskeletal DiseasesPositron-Emission TomographyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID23685709
OpenAlexW1971887780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.