Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23685068›Full record

ReviewTrends in microbiology2013

The prospects and challenges of universal vaccines for influenza.

Kanta Subbarao, Yumiko Matsuoka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Future epidemiological and economic impacts of universal influenza vaccines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Eliciting unnatural immune responses by activating cryptic epitopes in viral antigens.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kanta SubbaraoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. ksubbarao@niaid.nih.gov
Yumiko Matsuoka

Funding

Clinical Studies of Vaccines for Pandemic InfluenzaZIAAI000997 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI COHEN, JEFFREY · 2009 to 2021
$29.9M
Preclinical Studies of Vaccines for Pandemic InfluenzaZIAAI000933 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI SUBBARAO, KANTA · 2009 to 2017
$13.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI000933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is the most effective way to reduce the impact of epidemic as well as pandemic influenza. However, the licensed inactivated influenza vaccine induces strain-specific immunity and must be updated annually. When novel viruses appear, matched vaccines are not likely to be available in time for the first wave of a pandemic. Yet, the enormous diversity of influenza A viruses in nature makes it impossible to predict which subtype or strain will cause the next pandemic. Several recent scientific advances have generated renewed enthusiasm and hope for universal vaccines that will induce broad protection from a range of influenza viruses.

Indexed as

Cross ProtectionDrug DiscoveryHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23685068
PMCPMC3700639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.