Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23684876›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2013

Multivariate decoding of brain images using ordinal regression.

O M Doyle, J Ashburner, F O Zelaya, S C R Williams, M A Mehta, A F Marquand

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

O M DoyleKing's College London, Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry (PO89), De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Electronic address: orla.doyle@kcl.ac.uk.
J AshburnerWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: j.ashburner@ucl.ac.uk.
F O ZelayaKing's College London, Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry (PO89), De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Electronic address: fernando.zelaya@kcl.ac.uk.
S C R WilliamsKing's College London, Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry (PO89), De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Electronic address: steve.williams@kcl.ac.uk.
M A MehtaKing's College London, Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry (PO89), De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Electronic address: mitul.mehta@kcl.ac.uk.
A F MarquandKing's College London, Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry (PO89), De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Electronic address: andre.marquand@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 091593/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust WT088641/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging data are increasingly being used to predict potential outcomes or groupings, such as clinical severity, drug dose response, and transitional illness states. In these examples, the variable (target) we want to predict is ordinal in nature. Conventional classification schemes assume that the targets are nominal and hence ignore their ranked nature, whereas parametric and/or non-parametric regression models enforce a metric notion of distance between classes. Here, we propose a novel, alternative multivariate approach that overcomes these limitations - whole brain probabilistic ordinal regression using a Gaussian process framework. We applied this technique to two data sets of pharmacological neuroimaging data from healthy volunteers. The first study was designed to investigate the effect of ketamine on brain activity and its subsequent modulation with two compounds - lamotrigine and risperidone. The second study investigates the effect of scopolamine on cerebral blood flow and its modulation using donepezil. We compared ordinal regression to multi-class classification schemes and metric regression. Considering the modulation of ketamine with lamotrigine, we found that ordinal regression significantly outperformed multi-class classification and metric regression in terms of accuracy and mean absolute error. However, for risperidone ordinal regression significantly outperformed metric regression but performed similarly to multi-class classification both in terms of accuracy and mean absolute error. For the scopolamine data set, ordinal regression was found to outperform both multi-class and metric regression techniques considering the regional cerebral blood flow in the anterior cingulate cortex. Ordinal regression was thus the only method that performed well in all cases. Our results indicate the potential of an ordinal regression approach for neuroimaging data while providing a fully probabilistic framework with elegant approaches for model selection.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultBrainBrain MappingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRegression AnalysisYoung AdultGaussian processesKetamineMultivariateOrdinal regressionPharmacological MRIScopolamine

Identifiers

PMID23684876
PMCPMC4068378
OpenAlexW1998078060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.