Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23684873›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2013

Modeling functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) experimental variables in the Ontology of Experimental Variables and Values (OoEVV).

Gully A P C Burns, Jessica A Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gully A P C BurnsInformation Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1001, Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695, USA. gully@usc.edu
Jessica A Turner

Funding

BIO-INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORK COORDINATING CENTER (BIRN-CC)U24RR025736 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KESSELMAN, CARL · 2009 to 2011
$15.0M
Informatics Infrastructure for vector-based neuroanatomical atlasesR01MH079068 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BURNS, GULLY A. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
BrainMap Tracker: Automated Annotation of Brain Mapping ExperimentsR56MH097870 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI LAIRD, ANGELA R, TURNER, JESS · 2012 to 2013
$1.1M
BioScholar: a Biomedical Knowledge Engineering framework based on the published lR01GM083871 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BURNS, GULLY A. · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
Development of a Cognitive Paradigm Ontology: BrainMap and BIRN IntergrationR01MH084812 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON, TURNER, JESS · 2009 to 2011
$869k
NCRR NIH HHS 1 U24 RR025736-01NCRR NIH HHS U24 RR025736NIGMS NIH HHS GM083871NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083871NIMH NIH HHS 1R01MH084812-01A1NIMH NIH HHS MH079068NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079068NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging data is raw material for cognitive neuroscience experiments, leading to scientific knowledge about human neurological and psychological disease, language, perception, attention and ultimately, cognition. The structure of the variables used in the experimental design defines the structure of the data gathered in the experiments; this in turn structures the interpretative assertions that may be presented as experimental conclusions. Representing these assertions and the experimental data which support them in a computable way means that they could be used in logical reasoning environments, i.e. for automated meta-analyses, or linking hypotheses and results across different levels of neuroscientific experiments. Therefore, a crucial first step in being able to represent neuroimaging results in a clear, computable way is to develop representations for the scientific variables involved in neuroimaging experiments. These representations should be expressive, computable, valid, extensible, and easy-to-use. They should also leverage existing semantic standards to interoperate easily with other systems. We present an ontology design pattern called the Ontology of Experimental Variables and Values (OoEVV). This is designed to provide a lightweight framework to capture mathematical properties of data, with appropriate 'hooks' to permit linkage to other ontology-driven projects (such as the Ontology of Biomedical Investigations, OBI). We instantiate the OoEVV system with a small number of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging datasets, to demonstrate the system's ability to describe the variables of a neuroimaging experiment. OoEVV is designed to be compatible with the XCEDE neuroimaging data standard for data collection terminology, and with the Cognitive Paradigm Ontology (CogPO) for specific reasoning elements of neuroimaging experimental designs.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingSoftwareHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID23684873
PMCPMC4474486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.