Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23684639›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2013

Non-coding RNAs in DNA damage and repair.

Vivek Sharma, Tom Misteli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. DNA Damage Responses, the Trump Card of Stem Cells in the Survival Game.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Chromatin Remodeling and Epigenetic Regulation in Plant DNA Damage Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Upregulation of theGenes & diseases · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Microarray analysis of miRNA expression profiles following whole body irradiation in a mouse model.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vivek SharmaNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tom Misteli
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Nuclear Architecture and DiseaseZIABC010309 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MISTELI, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$39.8M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are increasingly recognized as central players in diverse biological processes. Upon DNA damage, the DNA damage response (DDR) elicits a complex signaling cascade, which includes the induction of multiple ncRNA species. Recent studies indicate that DNA-damage induced ncRNAs contribute to regulation of cell cycle, apoptosis and DNA repair, and thus play a key role in maintaining genome stability. This review summarizes the emerging role of ncRNAs in DNA damage and repair.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsDNA Repair EnzymesGene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRNA, UntranslatedSignal TransductionDNA Repair EnzymesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID23684639
PMCPMC3710463
OpenAlexW2066649300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.